Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Amber – better Beeper, a modern all-in-one messenger

useamber.app

21–30 of 86 posts

Re: Show HN: Amber – better Beeper, a modern all-in-one messenger

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

- Yep. You can read our privacy policy here: https://dimadolgopolovn.notion.site/Amber-Privacy-Policy-256... - Check out the demo in the original post. - We use native API or reverse-engineer a solution depending on the platform. This approach maintains the security standard as high as the original app. Everything is done locally on your computer.

At that point calling it end-to-end encrypted is not true.

What definition of "end-to-end encrypted" do you refer to, if on-device processing does not qualify? Isn't your device one of the endpoints in E2EE?

Re: Show HN: Amber – better Beeper, a modern all-in-one messenger

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Our users (including top founders and VCs) usually trust us with the AI features because it saves time and thinking. However, you can turn off the AI features if you're into full privacy. :)

> However, you can turn off the AI features if you're into full privacy. :) I think marketing for AI should always start off with "Includes opt-in AI features should you want them" instead of just "HEY WE HAVE AI" I feel like it would make a lot of people close the browser tab much later than expected.

great point

Re: Show HN: Amber – better Beeper, a modern all-in-one messenger

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> However, you can turn off the AI features if you're into full privacy. :) I think marketing for AI should always start off with "Includes opt-in AI features should you want them" instead of just "HEY WE HAVE AI" I feel like it would make a lot of people close the browser tab much later than expected.

great point

I'm one who loves some of the AI stuff after being a skeptic, but I see a LOT of immediate hatred for it, sadly even when it is purely opt-in (as it should be tbh).

Re: Show HN: Amber – better Beeper, a modern all-in-one messenger

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

- Yep. You can read our privacy policy here: https://dimadolgopolovn.notion.site/Amber-Privacy-Policy-256... - Check out the demo in the original post. - We use native API or reverse-engineer a solution depending on the platform. This approach maintains the security standard as high as the original app. Everything is done locally on your computer.

At that point calling it end-to-end encrypted is not true.

Can you elaborate where you think it stops being encrypted?

Re: Show HN: Amber – better Beeper, a modern all-in-one messenger

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At that point calling it end-to-end encrypted is not true.

What definition of "end-to-end encrypted" do you refer to, if on-device processing does not qualify? Isn't your device one of the endpoints in E2EE?

In context of instant messaging E2EE usually means that service providers servers don't ever see the plaintext with messages stored on device. Just the transport encryption is already an expectation for all networking.

- Signal: E2EE

- Telegram: by default, nah

- Discord, nah

Re: Show HN: Amber – better Beeper, a modern all-in-one messenger

#30
post #26

if you can make the UI/UX of this better than messages, whatsapps, etc combined, then I'd be willing to pay money for it.

Would love to hear your thoughts on the app! Feel free to reach out to me directly if you encounter any issues. dima@perillalabs.com
Post reply on HN