Live data from Hacker News

The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

positiveblue.substack.com

21–30 of 520 posts

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#21
post #3

I would love to get off Cloudflare but there are no real good alternatives

Writing backends that can actually handle public traffic and using authentication for expensive resources are fantastic alternatives.

Also, cheaply rate limiting malicious web clients should be something that is trivial to accomplish with competent web tooling (i.e., on your own servers). If this seems out of scope or infeasible, you might be using the wrong tools for the job.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#22
post #8
post #5

I have zero issue with Ai Agents, if there's a real user behind there somewhere. I DO have a major issue with my sites being crawled extremely aggressively by offenders including Meta, Perplexity and OpenAI - it's really annoying realising that we're tying up several cpu cores on AI crawling. Less than on real users and google et al.

They're getting to the point of 200-300RPS for some of my smaller marketing sites, hallucinating URLs like crazy. It's fucking insane.

You'd think they would have an interest in developing reasonable crawling infrastructure, like Google, Bing or Yandex. Instead they go all in on hosts with no metering. All of the search majors reduce their crawl rate as request times increase.

On one hand these companies announce themselves as sophisticated, futuristic and highly-valued, on the other hand we see rampant incompetence, to the point that webmasters everywhere are debating the best course of action.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#23
post #17
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AWS is an alternative no?

Bankruptcy as a surprise gift is not an alternative. Even those that use big cloud providers like AWS and GCP use CDNs like Cloudflare to protect themselves. And there is no free CDN like Cloudflare.

> And there is no free CDN like Cloudflare.

Their pricing page says:

No-nonsense Free Tier

As part of the AWS free Usage Tier you can get started with Amazon CloudFront for free.

Included in Always Free Tier

1 TB of data transfer out to the internet per month 10,000,000 HTTP or HTTPS Requests per month 2,000,000 CloudFront Function invocations per month 2,000,000 CloudFront KeyValueStore reads per month 10 Distribution Tenants Free SSL certificates No limitations, all features available

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#24
post #20

Everyone loves the dream of a free for all and open web. But the reality is how can someone small protect their blog or content from AI training bots? E.g.: They just blindly trust someone is sending Agent vs Training bots and super duper respecting robots.txt? Get real... Or, fine what if they do respect robots.txt, but they buy the data that may or may not have been shielded through liability layers via "licensed d…

You can lock it up with a user account and payment system. The fact the site is up on the internet doesn’t mean you can or cannot profit from it. It’s up to you. What I would like it’s a way to notify my isp and say, block this traffic to my site.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#25
post #9
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AWS is an alternative no?

AWS needs a dedicated AWS engineer while any technical person and some non-technical people have skill to set up Cloudflare. Esp. Without surprise bills.

I always hear this, but honestly I'm not sure it's true.

It's hard to assess the validity of this versus Cloudflare having a really good marketing department.

I've used neither, so I can't say, but I've also never seen anyone truly explain why/why-not.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#27
post #20

Everyone loves the dream of a free for all and open web. But the reality is how can someone small protect their blog or content from AI training bots? E.g.: They just blindly trust someone is sending Agent vs Training bots and super duper respecting robots.txt? Get real... Or, fine what if they do respect robots.txt, but they buy the data that may or may not have been shielded through liability layers via "licensed d…

By developing Free Software combating these hostile softwares.

Corporations develop hostile AI agents,

Capable hackers develop anti-AI-agents.

This defeatist atittude "we have no power".

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#28
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're getting to the point of 200-300RPS for some of my smaller marketing sites, hallucinating URLs like crazy. It's fucking insane.

You'd think they would have an interest in developing reasonable crawling infrastructure, like Google, Bing or Yandex. Instead they go all in on hosts with no metering. All of the search majors reduce their crawl rate as request times increase. On one hand these companies announce themselves as sophisticated, futuristic and highly-valued, on the other hand we see rampant incompetence, to the point that webmasters eve…

Honestly it's just tragedy of the commons. Why put the effort in when you don't have to identify yourself, just crawl and if you get blocked move the job to another server.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#29
We have far too many gatekeepers as it is. Any attempt to add any more should be treated as an act of aggression.

Cloudflare seems very vocal about its desire to become yet another digital gatekeeper as of late, and so is Google. I want both reduced to rubble if they persist in it.

Re: The web does not need gatekeepers: Cloudflare’s new “signed agents” pitch

#30
post #11

I would love that vision to become reality but what Cloudflare is doing is unfortunately necessary atm.

Ok, I'll bite. Why is turning the Internet into a walled garden necessary now?

Multi-Tbps DDoS attacks, pervasive scanning of sites for exploits, comically expensive egress bandwidth on services like AWS, and ISPs disallowing hosting services on residential accounts.
Post reply on HN