Live data from Hacker News

UK government states that 'safety' act is about influence over public discourse

bsky.app

21–30 of 298 posts

Re: UK government states that 'safety' act is about influence over public discourse

#21
post #11
post #4

This sounds like a misinterpretation. The OSA is primarily about making online service providers responsible for age verification, if they supply adult content. No different in principle from having to prove one's age to buy cigarettes, alcohol, knives, etc. No-one says "cigarettes are censored!", because, obviously, they're not. Same for adult content online. It can still be accessed, as long as proof of age is prov…

False equivalence, the local pub doesn’t keep track of your identity.

It's not about accessing pubs. It's about deciding what is a pub.

Re: UK government states that 'safety' act is about influence over public discourse

#22
post #17
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

False equivalence, the local pub doesn’t keep track of your identity.

Not to take away from your general point (which I agree with), but that depends where local is. > Identity technology used at a county's pubs and nightclubs since 2023 is to be extended for a further three years. > Northamptonshire Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner (PFCC) Danielle Stone has agreed to provide funding to keep the scheme at 25 venues that open beyond 01:00. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgm28lmk47…

Thanks for the context, jeez that’s concerning

Re: UK government states that 'safety' act is about influence over public discourse

#23

Without passing judgment on the act, this is incredibly misleading. I found the source of the original quotes[0], and they are taken quite out of context. From the article: >First, we are told, the relevant secretary of state (Michelle Donelan) expressed “concern” that the legislation might whack sites such as Amazon instead of Pornhub. In response, officials explained that the regulation in question was “not primari…

This is unfortunately quite a common tactic being used by people opposed to the OSA. Recently there was an article in the i newspaper which claimed you have to show ID to order pizza online, and it's because of the OSA. Turns out their source was a misleading tweet by a political activist who had ordered from Deliveroo or similar and were seeing the usual message shown to people who order alcohol. Nothing to do with…

Hmm. New account, no history before this thread. Not at all suspicious.

So, DSIT, Age Verification Industry Association or Molly Rose astroturfer?

Re: UK government states that 'safety' act is about influence over public discourse

#25
post #18

For the Americans looking at this act, you're maybe putting it in the context of American politics and thinking who cares if the porn sites have my face or id. But in the UK you can be arrested and jailed for saying something online that offends someone else.

Here is more information about the arrests that are currently taking place:

https://freespeechunion.org/police-make-30-arrests-a-day-for...

Re: UK government states that 'safety' act is about influence over public discourse

#27
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

False equivalence, the local pub doesn’t keep track of your identity.

Your local pub will have CCTV and some have names and photos of banned patrons behind the bar. Some bars and clubs have digital ID scanners upon entry. Most online service providers who verify age are using third-party suppliers who don't provide any details of one's identity, just whether the user has been age verified or not. And much of that is done by recording a selfie, not handing over identity documents.

Your example doesn’t work. They’re not keeping it for bad actors only, but for every one.

Stop trying to oversimplify the concept, it’s not a pub, it’s not a store, it’s a virtual service. This comparison doesn’t help us at all.

About the face and not ID: good thing we can’t identify someone using their face! /s

Re: UK government states that 'safety' act is about influence over public discourse

#28

Without passing judgment on the act, this is incredibly misleading. I found the source of the original quotes[0], and they are taken quite out of context. From the article: >First, we are told, the relevant secretary of state (Michelle Donelan) expressed “concern” that the legislation might whack sites such as Amazon instead of Pornhub. In response, officials explained that the regulation in question was “not primari…

Doesn't this just mean that it is about "protecting children" and influence over public discourse? The fact remains that the Category 1 rules impose onerous duties on websites that have a significant influence over public discourse, with the effect that many of them will see their influence significantly reduced and may have to fold altogether if they cannot afford to comply.

In fact it is pretty obvious from the OSA itself that the definition of Category 1 is not primarily about capturing porn sites.

Re: UK government states that 'safety' act is about influence over public discourse

#29
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

False equivalence, the local pub doesn’t keep track of your identity.

Your local pub will have CCTV and some have names and photos of banned patrons behind the bar. Some bars and clubs have digital ID scanners upon entry. Most online service providers who verify age are using third-party suppliers who don't provide any details of one's identity, just whether the user has been age verified or not. And much of that is done by recording a selfie, not handing over identity documents.

One local pub may have a face scanner, the other may not and I am free to choose which one I go to without fear of reprisals. Refusing to follow a government mandate can land me in jail.

Re: UK government states that 'safety' act is about influence over public discourse

#30
post #9

What’s with england and its complete lack of response to this kind of power grabs?

there's really nothing anybody can do. protests dont work, riots dont work, petitions dont work, and theres nobody else to vote for who isn't also a cunt.
Post reply on HN