Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nvidia is interested in commoditizing their complements. It's a business strategy to decrease the power of OpenAI (for instance). Nvidia dreams of a world where there are lots of "open" alternatives to OpenAI, like there are lots of open game engines and lots open software in general. All buying closed Nvidia chips.
Why is OpenAI a threat to Nvidia? They are still highly dependent on those GPUs
NSF and Nvidia award Ai2 $152M to support building an open AI ecosystem
21–30 of 96 posts
Re: NSF and Nvidia award Ai2 $152M to support building an open AI ecosystem
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nvidia is interested in commoditizing their complements. It's a business strategy to decrease the power of OpenAI (for instance). Nvidia dreams of a world where there are lots of "open" alternatives to OpenAI, like there are lots of open game engines and lots open software in general. All buying closed Nvidia chips.
> commoditizing their complements Feels like a modern euphemism for “subjugate their neighbors”.
Meanwhile, the companies running data centers will look for ways to support alternatives to Nvidia. That’s how they keep costs down.
It’s a good way to play companies off each other, when it works.
Re: NSF and Nvidia award Ai2 $152M to support building an open AI ecosystem
#23If Nvidia were interested in "open" AI, they would spend time to collaborate with AMD, etc. to build an (updated) open alternative to CUDA. That's probably the most closed part of the whole stack right now.
Nvidia is interested in commoditizing their complements. It's a business strategy to decrease the power of OpenAI (for instance). Nvidia dreams of a world where there are lots of "open" alternatives to OpenAI, like there are lots of open game engines and lots open software in general. All buying closed Nvidia chips.
Re: NSF and Nvidia award Ai2 $152M to support building an open AI ecosystem
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
> commoditizing their complements Feels like a modern euphemism for “subjugate their neighbors”.
No, it’s encouraging competition and cost-cutting in a part of the market they don’t control. This can be a reason for companies to support open source, for example. Meanwhile, the companies running data centers will look for ways to support alternatives to Nvidia. That’s how they keep costs down. It’s a good way to play companies off each other, when it works.
Re: NSF and Nvidia award Ai2 $152M to support building an open AI ecosystem
#25Re: NSF and Nvidia award Ai2 $152M to support building an open AI ecosystem
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nvidia is interested in commoditizing their complements. It's a business strategy to decrease the power of OpenAI (for instance). Nvidia dreams of a world where there are lots of "open" alternatives to OpenAI, like there are lots of open game engines and lots open software in general. All buying closed Nvidia chips.
But AI depends on a small number of tensor operators, primitives which can be relatively easily implemented by competitors, so compute is very close to being a commodity when it comes to AI. A company like Cerebras (founded in 2015) proves that this is true. The moat is not in computer architecture. I'd say the real moat is in semiconductor fabrication.
Semiconductor fabrication is a high risk business.
Nvidia invested heavily in CUDA and out-competed AMD (and Intel). They are working hard to keep their edge in developer mindshare, while chasing hardware profits at the same time.
Re: NSF and Nvidia award Ai2 $152M to support building an open AI ecosystem
#27If Nvidia were interested in "open" AI, they would spend time to collaborate with AMD, etc. to build an (updated) open alternative to CUDA. That's probably the most closed part of the whole stack right now.