So we should finally start seeing legal repercussions for all involved, and a great undoing of everything they’ve done?
Legal repercussions for all involved lowest rank technical staff and a great worsening of all they have done and even more. Just like it happens after every other govt blunder :)
Just how much has DOGE exaggerated its numbers? Now we have receipts
21–26 of 26 posts
Re: Just how much has DOGE exaggerated its numbers? Now we have receipts
#22When the time is "right", seize it all. We are just about there.
We have secret police, concentration camps, and now, federal occupation of a city.
Does anyone see a pattern?
Re: Just how much has DOGE exaggerated its numbers? Now we have receipts
#23[flagged]
Re: Just how much has DOGE exaggerated its numbers? Now we have receipts
#24[flagged]
Politico is owned by right-wing billionaire Axel Springer, who enforces various conservative ideological stances at his publications and who in 2020 asked his staff (slightly tongue in cheek) to pray for a Trump reelection.
But, you are correct that Axel Springer SE (the media company) has a right-wing slants, at least on some issues.
Re: Just how much has DOGE exaggerated its numbers? Now we have receipts
#25So we should finally start seeing legal repercussions for all involved, and a great undoing of everything they’ve done?
Legal repercussions for all involved lowest rank technical staff and a great worsening of all they have done and even more. Just like it happens after every other govt blunder :)
Their actions were intentional and malicious.
That’s like calling deciding to deny a same sex couple a marriage certificate a bureaucratic “blunder“ when it is in fact a targeted act using your position to supplant existing law to malign others based on your own interests.
Re: Just how much has DOGE exaggerated its numbers? Now we have receipts
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Legal repercussions for all involved lowest rank technical staff and a great worsening of all they have done and even more. Just like it happens after every other govt blunder :)
I think it is insincere to call what doge and its employees did a “blunder”. Their actions were intentional and malicious. That’s like calling deciding to deny a same sex couple a marriage certificate a bureaucratic “blunder“ when it is in fact a targeted act using your position to supplant existing law to malign others based on your own interests.