Live data from Hacker News

Claude vs. Gemini: Testing on 1M Tokens of Context

every.to

21–30 of 49 posts

Re: Claude vs. Gemini: Testing on 1M Tokens of Context

#21

I really doubt you can fit all Harry Potter books in 1M tokens.

The series is 1,084,170 words. At let's say 1.4 tokens per word, this would not fit, but it is getting close.

It's 2M tokens for Gemini.

Re: Claude vs. Gemini: Testing on 1M Tokens of Context

#22

i’m really curious how well they perform with a long chat history. i find that gemini often gets confused when the context is long enough and starts responding to prior prompts, using the cli or it’s gem chat window.

From my experience. Gemini is REALLY bad about context blending. It can't keep track of what I said and what it said in a conversation under 200K tokens. It blends concepts and statements up, then refers to some fabricated hybrid fact or comment. Gemini has done this in ways that I haven't seen in the recent or current generation models from OpenAI or Anthropic. It really surprised me that Gemini performs so well in…

I’ve not experimented with the recent models for this but older Gemini models were awful for this - they’d lie about what I’d said or what was in their system prompt even with short conversations.

Re: Claude vs. Gemini: Testing on 1M Tokens of Context

#23
What people seem to miss very hard is that they get interactive chat mode of all the models, including the best and newest (Gemini 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.5 Flash Lite and older) totally for free. I mean when working from chat at https://aistudio.google.com/ the entire 1M context window and all is totally free of charge. You really get a very good AI for nothing.

https://i.imgur.com/pgfRrZY.png

Re: Claude vs. Gemini: Testing on 1M Tokens of Context

#24

What people seem to miss very hard is that they get interactive chat mode of all the models, including the best and newest (Gemini 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.5 Flash Lite and older) totally for free. I mean when working from chat at https://aistudio.google.com/ the entire 1M context window and all is totally free of charge. You really get a very good AI for nothing. https://i.imgur.com/pgfRrZY.png

Can you opt out of them training on your data in that free tier?

Re: Claude vs. Gemini: Testing on 1M Tokens of Context

#25
post #24

What people seem to miss very hard is that they get interactive chat mode of all the models, including the best and newest (Gemini 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.5 Flash Lite and older) totally for free. I mean when working from chat at https://aistudio.google.com/ the entire 1M context window and all is totally free of charge. You really get a very good AI for nothing. https://i.imgur.com/pgfRrZY.png

Can you opt out of them training on your data in that free tier?

[deleted]

Re: Claude vs. Gemini: Testing on 1M Tokens of Context

#26
post #24

What people seem to miss very hard is that they get interactive chat mode of all the models, including the best and newest (Gemini 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.5 Flash Lite and older) totally for free. I mean when working from chat at https://aistudio.google.com/ the entire 1M context window and all is totally free of charge. You really get a very good AI for nothing. https://i.imgur.com/pgfRrZY.png

Can you opt out of them training on your data in that free tier?

If you have cloud billing enabled you can still use it for free and they say they don't train on it. https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/billing#paid-api-ai-st...

Re: Claude vs. Gemini: Testing on 1M Tokens of Context

#27

What people seem to miss very hard is that they get interactive chat mode of all the models, including the best and newest (Gemini 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.5 Flash Lite and older) totally for free. I mean when working from chat at https://aistudio.google.com/ the entire 1M context window and all is totally free of charge. You really get a very good AI for nothing. https://i.imgur.com/pgfRrZY.png

Geminis free tier allows maybe 5 messages on average, for 2.5 pro at least and this is not usable.

I’m using Claude Pro for daily driver and Gemini / ChatGPT free tiers.

Re: Claude vs. Gemini: Testing on 1M Tokens of Context

#28

What people seem to miss very hard is that they get interactive chat mode of all the models, including the best and newest (Gemini 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.5 Flash Lite and older) totally for free. I mean when working from chat at https://aistudio.google.com/ the entire 1M context window and all is totally free of charge. You really get a very good AI for nothing. https://i.imgur.com/pgfRrZY.png

[deleted]

Re: Claude vs. Gemini: Testing on 1M Tokens of Context

#29
post #27

What people seem to miss very hard is that they get interactive chat mode of all the models, including the best and newest (Gemini 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.5 Flash Lite and older) totally for free. I mean when working from chat at https://aistudio.google.com/ the entire 1M context window and all is totally free of charge. You really get a very good AI for nothing. https://i.imgur.com/pgfRrZY.png

Geminis free tier allows maybe 5 messages on average, for 2.5 pro at least and this is not usable. I’m using Claude Pro for daily driver and Gemini / ChatGPT free tiers.

> Geminis free tier allows maybe 5 messages on average, for 2.5 pro at least and this is not usable.

Not on ai studio.

Re: Claude vs. Gemini: Testing on 1M Tokens of Context

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The series is 1,084,170 words. At let's say 1.4 tokens per word, this would not fit, but it is getting close.

It's 2M tokens for Gemini.

That was previous iterations, 2.5 is 1 million context window

https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/models (context window is details under model variant section with + signs)

They were meant to crank 2.5 to 2 million at some point though, maybe waiting now till 3?

Post reply on HN