Live data from Hacker News

Fei-Fei Li: Spatial intelligence is the next frontier in AI [video]

youtube.com

21–30 of 163 posts

Re: Fei-Fei Li: Spatial intelligence is the next frontier in AI [video]

#22

I appreciate the video and generally agree with Fei-Fei but I think it almost understates how different the problem of reasoning about the physical world actually is. Most dynamics of the physical world are sparse, non-linear systems at every level of resolution. Most ways of constructing accurate models mathematically don’t actually work. LLMs, for better or worse, are pretty classic (in an algorithmic information t…

To make this more concrete: ImageNet enabled computer "vision" by providing images + labels, enabling the computer to take an image and spit out a label. LLM training sets enable text completion by providing text + completions, enabling the computer to take a piece of text and spit out its completion. Learning how the physical world works (not just kind of works a la videogames, actually works) is not only about a jillion times more complicated, there is really only one usable dataset: the world itself, which cannot be compacted or fed into a computer at high speed.

"Spatial awareness" itself is kind of a simplification: the idea that you can be aware of space or 3d objects' behavior without the social context of what an "object" is or how it relates to your own physical existence. Like you could have two essentially identical objects but they are not interchangeable (original Declaration of Independence vs a copy, etc). And many many other borderline-philosophical questions about when an object becomes two, etc.

Re: Fei-Fei Li: Spatial intelligence is the next frontier in AI [video]

#23
we're actually working on a practical implementation of aspects of what Fei-Fei describes - although with a more narrow focus on optimizing operations in the physical space (mining, energy, defense etc) https://hivekit.io/about/our-vision/

Re: Fei-Fei Li: Spatial intelligence is the next frontier in AI [video]

#24

I appreciate the video and generally agree with Fei-Fei but I think it almost understates how different the problem of reasoning about the physical world actually is. Most dynamics of the physical world are sparse, non-linear systems at every level of resolution. Most ways of constructing accurate models mathematically don’t actually work. LLMs, for better or worse, are pretty classic (in an algorithmic information t…

> became highly developed over two decades but is not in the public literature.

Developed by who? And for what purpose? Are we talking about overlap with stuff like missile guidance systems or targeting control systems or something, and kept confidential by the military-industrial complex? I'm having a hard time seeing many other scenarios that would explain a large body of people doing research in this area and then not publishing anything.

> I can’t identify anyone on the team that is an expert in a relevant area of computer science theory

Who is an expert on this theory then?

Re: Fei-Fei Li: Spatial intelligence is the next frontier in AI [video]

#25

I tried LLM's for geolocation recently and it is both amazing how good they are at recognizing patterns and how terrible they are with recognizing and utilizing basic spatial relationships.

I've tried to use various OpenAI models for OpenSCAD code generation, and while the code was valid, it absolutely couldn't get spatial relationships right. Even in simple cases, like a U-tube assembled from 3 straight and 2 curved segments. So this is definitely an area for improvement.

Re: Fei-Fei Li: Spatial intelligence is the next frontier in AI [video]

#27
We've been working on this challenge in the satellite domain with https://earthgpt.app. It’s a subset of what Fei-Fei is describing, but comes with its own unique issues like handling multi-resolution sensors and imagery with hundreds of spectral bands. Think of it as computer vision, but in n-dimensions.

Happy to answer questions if you're curious. PS. still in early beta, so please be gentle!

Re: Fei-Fei Li: Spatial intelligence is the next frontier in AI [video]

#28

I appreciate the video and generally agree with Fei-Fei but I think it almost understates how different the problem of reasoning about the physical world actually is. Most dynamics of the physical world are sparse, non-linear systems at every level of resolution. Most ways of constructing accurate models mathematically don’t actually work. LLMs, for better or worse, are pretty classic (in an algorithmic information t…

> There are a bunch of fundamental computer science problems that stand in the way, which I was schooled on in 2006 from the brightest minds in the field. For example, how do you represent arbitrary spatial relationships on computers in a general and scalable way? There are no solutions in the public data structures and algorithms literature. We know that universal solutions can’t exist and that all practical solutions require exotic high-dimensionality computational constructs that human brains will struggle to reason about. This has been the status quo since the 1980s. This particular set of problems is hard for a reason.

Where can I read more about this space? (particularly on the "we know that universal solutions can't exist" front)

Re: Fei-Fei Li: Spatial intelligence is the next frontier in AI [video]

#29
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would like to read a complete example if you want to share (I am not disputing yourbpoint, I'd just to understand better because this is not my field so I cannot immediately map your comment to my own experience)

Happy to share an complete example privately, contact data is in my profile. Will add condensed version here in half an hour.

Condensed version will be more than adequate, thanks!

Re: Fei-Fei Li: Spatial intelligence is the next frontier in AI [video]

#30
post #14
post #3

It's hard to describe, but it's felt like LLMs have completely sucked the entire energy out of computer vision. Like... I know CVPR still happens and there's great research that comes out of it, but almost every single job posting in ML is about LLMs to do this and that to the detriment of computer vision.

yeah, see my other comment. To me its totally obvious that we will have a plethora of very valuable startups who use RL techniques to solve realworld problems in practical areas of engineering .. and I just get blank stares when I talk about this :] Ive stopped saying AI when I mean ML or RL .. because people equate LLMs with AI. We need better ML / RL algos for CV tasks : - detecting lines from pixels - detecting ge…

I thought there been a lot of progress in last 2 years. (Video) Depth Anything, SAM2, grounding Dino, DFINE, VLM, Gaussian splats, Nerf. Sure less than progres in LLm but still I would say progress accelerated with LLM research.
Post reply on HN