Live data from Hacker News

99% of AI Startups Will Be Dead by 2026 – Here's Why

skooloflife.medium.com

21–25 of 25 posts

Re: 99% of AI Startups Will Be Dead by 2026 – Here's Why

#21
post #5

What does this guy look at on Instagram to get a feed like that? It sounds like he sees what he does because that is all he looks for.

sure, but sometimes it will randomly flood you with some garbage topic. maybe its an escape hatch for low engagement accounts but everytime i (accidentally) see the search or reels list its usually some concerted normie theme

Re: 99% of AI Startups Will Be Dead by 2026 – Here's Why

#22

> And they’re charging 50–100/month to do what anyone could replicate for pennies. It’s not just overpriced — it’s dishonest. The entire business model relies on the user not knowing how simple it really is. But this is general SaaS model. Wrap thing that are being done by lower level software such as FFmpeg and expose them in a nice GUI ready for use by people who are not technical. So what can change in the example…

Yeah, you can also make the argument many saas things are just postgres with some templates :)

Re: 99% of AI Startups Will Be Dead by 2026 – Here's Why

#23

> Wrappers rely on OpenAI. OpenAI relies on Microsoft. Microsoft needs NVIDIA. NVIDIA owns the chips that power it all So this is the model that investors see. The reality is quite different. People and orgs are not stupid and want to avoid vendor lock-in. So in reality: * Wrapper don't only rely on OpenAI. In fact, in order to be competitive, they have to avoid OpenAI because it's terribly expensive. If they can get…

> Local models are a thing. You don't need proprietary models and API calls at all for certain uses. And these models get better and better each year. They are getting better so fast that I'm considering building a business that depends on much lower cost LLM inference. So betting years of effort on it. But the bet is also that the proprietary models won't run away with faster improvements that make local models unco…

> The safer plan may be to pass the inference cost through to the user and let them pick premium or budget models according to their need almost per request, as Zed editor does now.

I'm working on a solution right now that is using a local/cheap model first, does some validation, and if this validation fails, use the expensive SOTA model. This is the most reasonable approach if you have a way to verify the results somehow (which might not be easy depending on the use case).

Re: 99% of AI Startups Will Be Dead by 2026 – Here's Why

#24

Rant incoming. I know it's bad form to critique anything but the content... but I wish the story wasn't padded with those bland GenAI eyesores of an image. It's a dumb kneejerk reaction I observe in myself, but the presence of generated graphics anywhere immediately turn me off. GenAI padded blog post? Guess your content isn't interesting enough. GenAI album cover? Artist must be equally lazy at making music. GenAI g…

> Please, could have just slapped nothing but text on there & let your content, whatever it is, do the talking.

Maybe this explains some of the success of brat by Charli xcx last summer

Post reply on HN