Live data from Hacker News

Directory of MCP Servers

github.com

21–30 of 68 posts

Re: Directory of MCP Servers

#21
I wonder if there's a market for someone figuring out how to build monetization into MCP or something similar.

Being able to offer a helpful API to the world and just getting paid whenever someone uses it would be really nice.

At the moment you have to process the payment "yourself" (even if you use a third party for that), issue an API key, etc.

Re: Directory of MCP Servers

#24
post #5

You don't need MCP you just need function calling

Yeah, but there is a distinct advantage to using a standard. Suppose you want your agent to use postgres or git or even file modification. You write your code to use MCP and your backend is already available. It's code you don't have to write.

Are we still writing code?

Re: Directory of MCP Servers

#25
So far, I’ve catalogued over 6,000 MCP servers.

If you’re interested in the next layer beyond just discovering MCP servers, I’ve been working on https://ninja.ai — an app store for AI assistants to connect to tools via MCP, without needing to touch the command line. Think one-click installs for pipes that let agents actually do things like triage email or book Ubers.

Would love feedback if you’re experimenting in this space too!

Re: Directory of MCP Servers

#26

I wonder if there's a market for someone figuring out how to build monetization into MCP or something similar. Being able to offer a helpful API to the world and just getting paid whenever someone uses it would be really nice. At the moment you have to process the payment "yourself" (even if you use a third party for that), issue an API key, etc.

I reckon the target market would have to be non-developers (because MCP servers are easily reproducible with LLMs, they even encourage it in the docs), and you wouldn't even mention MCP. Just have a list of tools which you can optionally enable in the chat client

Re: Directory of MCP Servers

#27
post #12
post #5

You don't need MCP you just need function calling

Yes because we should all be building function calling implementations for the same 10 SaaS services rather than using 10 standard MCP servers.

But the standard servers should be hosted by the service provider, like mcp.slack.com as a counterpart to api.slack.com

Why should I be self-hosting ANY local MCP server for accessing an external service?

Re: Directory of MCP Servers

#29
post #13

There's a huge gap in this market for someone who can take these and make them trustworthy. Maybe the OpenRouter of MCP.

The underlying issue is always relying on a third party, on openrouter you're trusting the end model provider to not do funny business can't really fix this

If you're paying said third party it's a decent mitigation.

Re: Directory of MCP Servers

#30
post #27
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes because we should all be building function calling implementations for the same 10 SaaS services rather than using 10 standard MCP servers.

But the standard servers should be hosted by the service provider, like mcp.slack.com as a counterpart to api.slack.com Why should I be self-hosting ANY local MCP server for accessing an external service?

That is being done as a stop gap until official servers are released. Ideally you are writing a server for your own product/service, or custom local work.

i.e. I wrote a server for water.gov to pull the river height prediction nearby for the next 24hr. This helps the campground welcome message writing tool craft a better welcome message.

Sure that could be a plain tool call, but why not make it portable into any AI service.

Post reply on HN