Live data from Hacker News

Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

developers.googleblog.com

21–30 of 286 posts

Re: Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

#23

? Am I missing something? These have been out for a while; if you follow the HF link you can see, for example, the 27b quant has been downloaded from HF 64,000 times over the last 10 days. Is there something more to this, or is just a follow up blog post? (is it just that ollama finally has partial (no images right?) support? Or something else?)

The linked blog post was 2 days ago

Re: Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

QAT “quantization aware training” means they had it quantized to 4 bits during training rather than after training in full or half precision. It’s supposedly a higher quality, but unfortunately they don’t show any comparisons between QAT and post-training quantization.

I understand that, but the qat models (1) are not new uploads. How is this more significant now than when they were uploaded 2 weeks ago? Are we expecting new models? I don’t understand the timing. This post feels like it’s two weeks late. [1] - https://huggingface.co/collections/google/gemma-3-qat-67ee61...

8 days is closer to 1 week then 2. And it’s a blog post, nobody owes you realtime updates.

Re: Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

#25
post #2

Available on ollama: https://ollama.com/library/gemma3

How many times do I have to say this? Ollama, llamacpp, and many other projects are slower than vLLM/sglang. vLLM is a much superior inference engine and is fully supported by the only LLM frontends that matter (sillytavern). The community getting obsessed with Ollama has done huge damage to the field, as it's ineffecient compared to vLLM. Many people can get far more tok/s than they think they could if only they kne…

The significant convenience benefits outweigh the higher TPS that vLLM offers in the context of my single machine homelab GPU server. If I was hosting it for something more critical than just myself and a few friends chatting with it, sure. Being able to just paste a model name into Open WebUI and run it is important to me though.

It is important to know about both to decide between the two for your use case though.

Re: Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

#26
post #9

They keep mentioning the RTX 3090 (with 24 GB VRAM), but the model is only 14.1 GB. Shouldn’t it fit a 5060 Ti 16GB, for instance?

With a 128K context length and 8 bit KV cache, the 27b model occupies 22 GiB on my system. With a smaller context length you should be able to fit it on a 16 GiB GPU.

Re: Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

#27
post #7
post #2

Available on ollama: https://ollama.com/library/gemma3

Make sure you're using the "-it-qat" suffixed models like "gemma3:27b-it-qat"

Here are the direct links:

https://ollama.com/library/gemma3:27b-it-qat

https://ollama.com/library/gemma3:12b-it-qat

https://ollama.com/library/gemma3:4b-it-qat

https://ollama.com/library/gemma3:1b-it-qat

Re: Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

#28
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand that, but the qat models (1) are not new uploads. How is this more significant now than when they were uploaded 2 weeks ago? Are we expecting new models? I don’t understand the timing. This post feels like it’s two weeks late. [1] - https://huggingface.co/collections/google/gemma-3-qat-67ee61...

8 days is closer to 1 week then 2. And it’s a blog post, nobody owes you realtime updates.

https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-3-27b-it-qat-q4_0-gguf/t...

> 17 days ago

Anywaaay...

I'm literally asking, quite honestly, if this is just an 'after the fact' update literally weeks later, that they uploaded a bunch of models, or if there is something more significant about this I'm missing.

Re: Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs

#30
post #18

Could 16gb vram be enough for the 27b QAT version?

With `ollama run gemma3:27b-it-qat "What is blue"`, GPU memory usage is just a hair over 20GB, so no, probably not without a nerfed context window

Indeed, the default context length in ollama is a mere 2048 tokens.
Post reply on HN