Live data from Hacker News

Kermit: A typeface for kids

microsoft.design

21–30 of 181 posts

Re: Kermit: A typeface for kids

#21

For all their talk about how they think this will help kids read, I didn't see any evidence that they actually did any studies on whether or not this font has any affect at all.

All I saw were the two references about representing prosody typographically.

Re: Kermit: A typeface for kids

#23
post #6

Is there any evidence that any font has a positive impact on reading (beyond obviously bad fonts being slow)? I'm very suspicious of this whole idea.

There's certainly a large amount of anecdotal evidence that a decent percentage of dyslexic people benefit from using Comic Sans. I don't know if there has ever been a formal study though.

There's also a view that all dyslexia doesn't have a single cause. If that is true, then there may be different things that are helpful depending on the exact cause.

Re: Kermit: A typeface for kids

#24
I really like this. Just some anecdata from someone without a reading disability but who doesn’t love reading, I feel like does make reading easier for me. Maybe it’s just because I like the way it looks more than most fonts, I’m not sure, but I’m happy this exists and research is being done in this area. I’ll be trying this out in my email client and other applications if the fonts are available for download.

Re: Kermit: A typeface for kids

#26
post #8

Maybe it's easy for kids to read, but I found the font too bold and the letters too close-together to read comfortably. I gave up before I could read all their justifications for those decisions. But that might've also been the weird scrolling behavior of the page that ruined it for me.

Yeah, I found this a lot harder to read and more strain on my eyes than something simple like the font used in the comments here.

It definitely seems too thick to me.

Re: Kermit: A typeface for kids

#27

Yikes, I gave up reading this after about 20 seconds, idk what it was but this font is unreadable.

Agreed, this is hard to read.

My initial impression was I can't read it fast, and when I try to read it fast then I miss words and have to go back.

If anything, it forces you to slow down. Maybe that's good for people who are learning to read. But for experienced readers, that seems bad.

On the plus side, the feeling of reading this is nice. It is easy on the eyes.

This might be a good fit for educational material. But I would not use this for journalism or literature.

Re: Kermit: A typeface for kids

#28

For all their talk about how they think this will help kids read, I didn't see any evidence that they actually did any studies on whether or not this font has any affect at all.

This is unfortunately the threshold of scrutiny that most online education apps operate along - "it looks good so kids must love it".

Re: Kermit: A typeface for kids

#30

This is anecdotal and I hope someone who has some research experience can say whether this is true or not generally, but I recently got a Kindle and found that if I use really large font sizes where there are fewer than 50 words on a page it's easier for me to stay engaged. Maybe this has something to do with cognitive load or chunking information. Some fonts look quite a bit better at these large sizes. So for me I…

I knew someone who would with an opaque ruler with a hole on one end. They would read the words through the hole and I guess it helped them stay focused on just the word or two they were reading. It sounds somewhat similar to what you are describing.
Post reply on HN