Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

GPT-4.1 in the API

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 513 posts

Re: GPT-4.1 in the API

#21

Post by rvz »

codingwagie wrote: post #10

GPT-4.1 probably is a distilled version of GPT-4.5 I dont understand the constant complaining about naming conventions. The number system differentiates the models based on capability, any other method would not do that. After ten models with random names like "gemini", "nebula" you would have no idea which is which. Its a low IQ take. You dont name new versions of software as completely different software Also, Yest…

> Yesterday, using v0, I replicated a full nextjs UI copying a major saas player. No backend integration, but the design and UX were stunning, and better than I could do if I tried.

Exactly. Those who do frontend or focus on pretty much anything Javascript are, how should I say it? Cooked?

> Software will get automated

The first to go are those that use JavaScript / TypeScript engineers have already been automated out of a job. It is all over for them.

Re: GPT-4.1 in the API

#22

Post by jsheard »

codingwagie wrote: post #10

GPT-4.1 probably is a distilled version of GPT-4.5 I dont understand the constant complaining about naming conventions. The number system differentiates the models based on capability, any other method would not do that. After ten models with random names like "gemini", "nebula" you would have no idea which is which. Its a low IQ take. You dont name new versions of software as completely different software Also, Yest…

> using v0, I replicated a full nextjs UI copying a major saas player. No backend integration, but the design and UX were stunning

AI is amazing, now all you need to create a stunning UI is for someone else to make it first so an AI can rip it off. Not beating the "plagiarism machine" allegations here.

Re: GPT-4.1 in the API

#23

Post by meetpateltech »

GPT-4.1 Pricing (per 1M tokens):

gpt-4.1

- Input: $2.00

- Cached Input: $0.50

- Output: $8.00

gpt-4.1-mini

- Input: $0.40

- Cached Input: $0.10

- Output: $1.60

gpt-4.1-nano

- Input: $0.10

- Cached Input: $0.025

- Output: $0.40

Re: GPT-4.1 in the API

#25

Post by minimaxir »

It's not the point of the announcement, but I do like the use of the (abs) subscript to demonstrate the improvement in LLM performance since in these types of benchmark descriptions I never can tell if the percentage increase is absolute or relative.

Re: GPT-4.1 in the API

#26

Post by pixl97 »

croes wrote: post #19
polytely wrote: post #18

It seems that OpenAI is really differentiating itself in the AI market by developing the most incomprehensible product names in the history of software.

They learned from the best: Microsoft

"Hey buddy, want some .Net, oh I mean dotnet"

Re: GPT-4.1 in the API

#27

Post by codingwagie »

rvz wrote: post #21
codingwagie wrote: post #10

GPT-4.1 probably is a distilled version of GPT-4.5 I dont understand the constant complaining about naming conventions. The number system differentiates the models based on capability, any other method would not do that. After ten models with random names like "gemini", "nebula" you would have no idea which is which. Its a low IQ take. You dont name new versions of software as completely different software Also, Yest…

> Yesterday, using v0, I replicated a full nextjs UI copying a major saas player. No backend integration, but the design and UX were stunning, and better than I could do if I tried. Exactly. Those who do frontend or focus on pretty much anything Javascript are, how should I say it? Cooked? > Software will get automated The first to go are those that use JavaScript / TypeScript engineers have already been automated ou…

Yeah its over for them. Complicated business logic and sprawling systems are what are keeping backend safe for now. But the big front end code bases where individual files (like react components) are largely decoupled from the rest of the code base is why front end is completely cooked

Re: GPT-4.1 in the API

#29

Post by Philpax »

codingwagie wrote: post #10

GPT-4.1 probably is a distilled version of GPT-4.5 I dont understand the constant complaining about naming conventions. The number system differentiates the models based on capability, any other method would not do that. After ten models with random names like "gemini", "nebula" you would have no idea which is which. Its a low IQ take. You dont name new versions of software as completely different software Also, Yest…

> The number system differentiates the models based on capability, any other method would not do that.

Please rank GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4.1-nano, GPT-4.1-mini, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.5, o1-mini, o1, o1 pro, o3-mini, o3-mini-high, o3, and o4-mini in terms of capability without consulting any documentation.

Re: GPT-4.1 in the API

#30

Post by codingwagie »

jsheard wrote: post #22
codingwagie wrote: post #10

GPT-4.1 probably is a distilled version of GPT-4.5 I dont understand the constant complaining about naming conventions. The number system differentiates the models based on capability, any other method would not do that. After ten models with random names like "gemini", "nebula" you would have no idea which is which. Its a low IQ take. You dont name new versions of software as completely different software Also, Yest…

> using v0, I replicated a full nextjs UI copying a major saas player. No backend integration, but the design and UX were stunning AI is amazing, now all you need to create a stunning UI is for someone else to make it first so an AI can rip it off. Not beating the "plagiarism machine" allegations here.

Heres a secret: Most of the highest funded VC backed software companies are just copying a competitor with a slight product spin/different pricing model
Post reply on HN