SeedLM: Compressing LLM Weights into Seeds of Pseudo-Random Generators
21–30 of 39 posts
Re: SeedLM: Compressing LLM Weights into Seeds of Pseudo-Random Generators
#22all this and they can't launch Apple intelligence on schedule :(
Re: SeedLM: Compressing LLM Weights into Seeds of Pseudo-Random Generators
#23Does he mean they did pretraining but not fine tuning?
Re: SeedLM: Compressing LLM Weights into Seeds of Pseudo-Random Generators
#24all this and they can't launch Apple intelligence on schedule :(
We need advancements like this if we want on-device AI to work well. This is the kind of thing Apple Silicon needs especially. It's weak relative to Nvidia consumer chips.
Re: SeedLM: Compressing LLM Weights into Seeds of Pseudo-Random Generators
#25all this and they can't launch Apple intelligence on schedule :(
Honestly, this seems like enabling work. Even the iPhone 16 Pro Max only seems to have 8GB RAM. If Apple Intelligence plans to do anything useful on-device, they need work like this.
Re: SeedLM: Compressing LLM Weights into Seeds of Pseudo-Random Generators
#26Re: SeedLM: Compressing LLM Weights into Seeds of Pseudo-Random Generators
#27A variant I have been thinking of: each parameter matrix (or block) is the sum of a random matrix (generated from a seed) and a low rank matrix (a LoRA). I'd like to experiment training from scratch in that setting.
It covers some experiments on weight tying, one of which is actually LoRA and random weights.
Re: SeedLM: Compressing LLM Weights into Seeds of Pseudo-Random Generators
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
For zero-shot accuracy from Table 3: * LLaMA 3 8B: baseline 72.26, 4-bit 71.31, 3-bit 62.79 * LLaMA 3 70B: baseline 79.51, 4-bit 78.06, 3-bit 74.68 These results seem comparable to modern quantization methods—for example, the ~4-bit results for smaller LLaMA models listed here: https://ai.meta.com/blog/meta-llama-quantized-lightweight-mo...
I don't see any comparable numbers on the page you linked. Seems to only have numbers for 1B and 3B parameter models. Comparisons to AWQ and OmniQuant in Table 3 seem quite favorable with SeedLM showing 10% - 50% better performance. Also seems like the techniques may be possible to combine.
Re: SeedLM: Compressing LLM Weights into Seeds of Pseudo-Random Generators
#29In general, compression using PRNGs is not a thing. There might be a special exception for this case, but I somewhat doubt it. =)
Re: SeedLM: Compressing LLM Weights into Seeds of Pseudo-Random Generators
#30I suspect an April fools joke. In general, compression using PRNGs is not a thing. There might be a special exception for this case, but I somewhat doubt it. =)