Saying quaternions require thinking in 4 dimensions seems like a lie with no proof. The geometric product is just the quaternion product broken up into scaler and vector parts.
> Saying quaternions require thinking in 4 dimensions seems like a lie with no proof. How could one even subject a statement like that to proof? If you insist that you thought about quaternions without thinking in 4D, and the author insists that you're just so used to thinking in 4D that you didn't even notice it, then who's to arbitrate that dispute? (I'm sensitive to these issues because I'm a mathematician of the…
So the dispute is just using words differently. For quaternions, I think its very important to understand how they apply to everyday space / reality / imagination / intuition / Geometry. I wish it was something everyone understood.
To prove that statement to a normal person in the normal dimension way you'd need to define your 4 dimensions like space, time, or scale and explain examples of quaternions.