That is chatgpt generated code too.
There’s a good chance the reason this is public is because he was using gist to transfer ChatGPT code between his personal computer and his government computer.
A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
21–30 of 404 posts
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#22Sadly his github is now private and the archived pages are mostly previews, not full repos.
Just search for forks: https://github.com/PatrickFanella/x-dm-downloader for example. We will probably have a short while (day or two) before false DMCA notices about this are actioned by GitHub
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#23This tells me all I need to know: # Read the CSV file df = pd.read_csv(csv_file) Thanks for the explanatory comment Jordan /s
You can even tell that's ChatGPT rather than, say, Claude. Redundant obvious comments are a stylistic signature of their models.
I wonder if they programmed that into them through RLHF, as a way of trying to teach the model that a preceding comment should be completed by whatever code is described by the comment
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#24[flagged]
bureaucrats? Don’t kid yourself.
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#25[flagged]
I don't care about the twitter DM thing, I care about gathering ton of open source sensitive data by an organization which is disemboweling the bureaucratic apparatus from within
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I clicked the twitter link. Perhaps because I don’t have an account, I don’t see any Community Notes nor can I read any other posts in the thread, so no point in using the “official” link. And it’s not like Community Notes will remain reliable. https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-says-hell-fix-community-notes-...
Because it is a pending note. Which often already are extremely relevant. Many see these as prominently as other CN's as becoming a "Community Noter" is not too hard.
>And it’s not like Community Notes will remain reliable.
That's as useless like saying your house might burn down in the next hour so might as well not go inside during a storm. CN's are the best weapon we have against misinformation given they require consensus from people that have disagreed in the past. Track record of CN's is unbeatable. They sure as hell are better than the abuse of flagging my factual parent comment on HN. Shame on whoever did that, but a honor system clearly isn't enough, sadly not even on HN.
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#27Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#28This tells me all I need to know: # Read the CSV file df = pd.read_csv(csv_file) Thanks for the explanatory comment Jordan /s
[dead]
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#29[dead]
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#30[flagged]
I don't care about the twitter DM thing, I care about gathering ton of open source sensitive data by an organization which is disemboweling the bureaucratic apparatus from within
Posting linked in followers seems egregious to me.
Guilt by association publicized for people to troll or harass people?
What happened to pretending or trying to be better than the people you hate? Why sink to their level?
Gathering open source data is a problem? lol it’s open!