In contrast, softmax has a very deep grounding in statistical physics - where it is called the Boltzmann distribution. In fact, this connection between statistical physics and machine learning was so fundamental that it was a key part of the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded to Hopfield and Hinton.
Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
21–30 of 116 posts
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#22OT: refusing to capitalize the first word of each sentence is an annoying posture that makes reading what you write more difficult. I tend to do it too when taking notes for myself because I'm the only reader and it saves picoseconds of typing; but I wouldn't dream on inflicting it upon others.
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#23Off topic: Unlike many out there I'm not usually bothered by lack of capitalization in comments or tweets, but for an essay like this, it makes the paragraphs so hard to read!
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#24i think that log-sum-exp should actually be the function that gets the name "softmax" because its actually a soft maximum over a set of values. And what we call "softmax" should be called "grad softmax" (since grad of logsumexp is softmax).
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#25Note: I am the author
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#26Softmax’s exponential comes from counting occupation states. Maximize the ways to arrange things with logits as energies, and you get exp(logits) over a partition function, pure Boltzmann style. It’s optimal because it’s how probability naturally piles up.
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#27Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#28Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#29An aside: please use proper capitalization. With this article I found myself backtracking thinking I’d missed a word, which was very annoying. Not sure what the authors intention was with that decision but please reconsider.
I'm all for Graham's pyramid of disagreement: we should focus on the core argument, rather than superfluous things like tone, or character, or capitalisation.
But this is too much for me personally. I just realised I consider the complete lack of capitalisation on a piece of public intellectual work to be obnoxious. Sorry, it's impractical, distracting and generates unnecessary cognitive load for everyone else.
You're the top comment right now, and it's not about the content of the article at all, which is a real shame. All the wasted thought cycles across so many people :(
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#30Because the domain is a Korean name, I half-expected this to be about an old Korean game company[1] with the same name. They made some banger RPGs at the time and had really great art books. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESA_(company)