Live data from Hacker News

Firing programmers for AI is a mistake

defragzone.substack.com

21–30 of 886 posts

Re: Firing programmers for AI is a mistake

#21

>>companies aren’t investing in junior developers It was a case before AI as well. Overall it reads the same as "Twitter will be destroyed by mass layoffs". But it is still online

Twitter is essentially losing money even with a bare bones staff

https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/24/24351317/elon-musk-x-twit...

It's being kept online because it's a good propaganda tool, not due to how it performs on the free market.

Re: Firing programmers for AI is a mistake

#22
post #11

We have fired all our programmers. However, the AI is hard to work with, it expects specific wording in order to program our code as expected. We have hired people with expertise in the specific language needed to transmit our specifications to the AI with more precision.

I sure empathize.... our AI is fussy and rigid... pedantic even.

Re: Firing programmers for AI is a mistake

#23
post #12

Many people are missing the point. The strategy for AI usage is not a long-term strategy to make the world more productive. If companies can save a buck this year, companies will do it. Period. The average manager has short-term goals that needs to fulfill, and if they can use AI to fulfill them they will do it, future be damned. To reign in on long-term consequences has always been part of government and regulations…

This, we really should have unionized several years ago

Re: Firing programmers for AI is a mistake

#26
Is that actually a thing? Anybody here being replaced with AI? I haven't observed any such trends around me and it's especially hard to imagine that happening in "tech" (the software industry). At this stage of AI development of course - if things continue at this pace anything is possible.

Re: Firing programmers for AI is a mistake

#27
post #23
post #12

Many people are missing the point. The strategy for AI usage is not a long-term strategy to make the world more productive. If companies can save a buck this year, companies will do it. Period. The average manager has short-term goals that needs to fulfill, and if they can use AI to fulfill them they will do it, future be damned. To reign in on long-term consequences has always been part of government and regulations…

This, we really should have unionized several years ago

Who is we?

Re: Firing programmers for AI is a mistake

#28
Such writings, articles, and sayings remind me of the Luddite movement. Unfortunately, preventing what is to come is not within our control. By fighting against windmills, one only bends the spear in hand. The Zeitgeist indicates that this will happen soon or in the near future. Even though developers are intelligent, hardworking, and good at their jobs, they will always be lacking and helpless in some way against these computational monsters that are extremely efficient and have access to a vast amount of information. Therefore, instead of such views, it is necessary to focus on the following more important concept: So, what will happen next?

Re: Firing programmers for AI is a mistake

#29
I'm sure there is a formal proof someone can flesh out.

- Half assed developer can construct a functional program with AI prompts.

- Deployed at scale for profit

- Many considerations were not considered due to lack of expertise (security, for example)

- Bad things happen for users.

I have at least two or three ideas that I've canned for now because it's just not safe for users (AI apps of that type require a lot of safety considerations). For example, you cannot create a collaborative AI app without considering how users can pollute the database with unsafe content (moderation).

I'm concerned a lot of people in this world are not being as cautious.

Re: Firing programmers for AI is a mistake

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

D̴i̴d̴n̴t̴ ̴f̴i̴r̴e̴ ̴a̴n̴y̴o̴n̴e̴ ̴p̴e̴r̴ ̴s̴e̴,̴ ̴b̴u̴t̴ ̴I̴ ̴a̴m̴ ̴a̴ ̴s̴o̴l̴o̴ ̴d̴e̴v̴e̴l̴o̴p̴e̴r̴ ̴a̴n̴d̴ ̴I̴ ̴c̴a̴n̴ ̴d̴o̴ ̴t̴h̴e̴ ̴w̴o̴r̴k̴ ̴o̴f̴ ̴2̴ ̴p̴e̴o̴p̴l̴e̴ ̴n̴o̴w̴ Edit: I am a solo developer and I have to work half the time only now.

Could have been "I am a solo developer and I have to work half the time only now."

Why does this never happen? :(
Post reply on HN