Live data from Hacker News

Bad Smart Watch Authentication

sprocketfox.io

21–30 of 36 posts

Re: Bad Smart Watch Authentication

#21

now if one could do some reverse engineering on Garmin watches and enable an opensource alternative to Garmin Connect, that would be marvellous.

What‘s wrong with Connect from your perspective? My only concern with it is that it’s slow

One problem with it is it requires a constant network connection for everything, which is baffling for software designed for devices where major intended uses involve being in situations with poor or no network connection.

Re: Bad Smart Watch Authentication

#22
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What‘s wrong with Connect from your perspective? My only concern with it is that it’s slow

One problem with it is it requires a constant network connection for everything, which is baffling for software designed for devices where major intended uses involve being in situations with poor or no network connection.

Do you need Connect to use the device though? I was under the impression Connect is used for sync.

Re: Bad Smart Watch Authentication

#23
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We need to use Unicode steganography to hide the message "this smartwatch sucks" into an innocent-looking review.

Apparently something similar is used by Chinese customers reviewing restaurants. They would make a food sign from food pieces that spells "crap food" in slang, but otherwise leave a stellar review for the restaurant.

It sounds like they're hesitant to leave a bad review, why is that?

Re: Bad Smart Watch Authentication

#24
post #2

I wish there was a concept of paid expert reviews on Amazon/everywhere. A general review system works well (ignoring review gaming) when your concern is "Does this shirt fit?" or "What's the build quality?", but fails when one expert review of "This device is fundamentally unsound," gets drowned out by reviews on the more easily testable aspects ("The band is really comfortable!"). A great example would be when Benso…

Project Farm!

Seconding this, Project Farm absolutely rules. I’m not the target demographic for probably half the stuff he reviews but I’m always impressed with his videos.

That said I’m a little curious if any kind of Gell-Mann effect is going on since he never reviews products that I already have extensive experience with. I’m wondering if anyone has watched any of his reviews and came away feeling like he did a really poor job.

Re: Bad Smart Watch Authentication

#25
Now, I'm not going to say this is great, but honestly it seems pretty close to a "who cares?" situation.

We are talking about a device with no internet connection that can only be accessed by someone in the same proximity to yourself.

Perhaps don't buy this watch if you live in a crowded location and take public transport a lot. For everyone else, seems really unlikely that the people you interact with will have setup a malicious attack for your watch brand. I don't think wardriving smart watches is a thing.

I'd only suggest that if the watch supports putting a credit card on it that you rethink doing that.

Re: Bad Smart Watch Authentication

#26
post #2

I wish there was a concept of paid expert reviews on Amazon/everywhere. A general review system works well (ignoring review gaming) when your concern is "Does this shirt fit?" or "What's the build quality?", but fails when one expert review of "This device is fundamentally unsound," gets drowned out by reviews on the more easily testable aspects ("The band is really comfortable!"). A great example would be when Benso…

Find a business model for Consumer Reports that better fits this century and add things that should be obvious like "Search by ASIN" to their website?

Re: Bad Smart Watch Authentication

#27
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One problem with it is it requires a constant network connection for everything, which is baffling for software designed for devices where major intended uses involve being in situations with poor or no network connection.

Do you need Connect to use the device though? I was under the impression Connect is used for sync.

You can't do things like sync the watch to the phone and look at visualizations on the bigger phone screen while you're offline.

It's weird how much they still maintain a difference between a "fitness" watch and an "outdoors" watch and the supporting software.

It's the silly bifurcation between Garmin Connect and Garmin Explore software and online service worlds. It seems like an arbitrary accident of corporate history and leaky abstractions.

Re: Bad Smart Watch Authentication

#28
post #8
post #2

I wish there was a concept of paid expert reviews on Amazon/everywhere. A general review system works well (ignoring review gaming) when your concern is "Does this shirt fit?" or "What's the build quality?", but fails when one expert review of "This device is fundamentally unsound," gets drowned out by reviews on the more easily testable aspects ("The band is really comfortable!"). A great example would be when Benso…

I considered doing this once, a few years ago, but I couldn't figure out a way to make it work. It's pretty frustrating that when you're shopping for a laptop, nobody can tell you it'll suspend properly under Linux. Or when you're shopping for a bike light nobody can tell you whether over the summer it'll self-discharge to the point it bricks itself due to cell imbalance. Or when you're shopping for a microsd card, n…

I get your point. But ever so often you stumble upon someone actually doing exactly that within their particular interest domain, such as the guy in Netherlands who buys and tests bike lights

https://swhs.home.xs4all.nl/fiets/tests/verlichting/index_en...

Re: Bad Smart Watch Authentication

#29
post #3
post #2

I wish there was a concept of paid expert reviews on Amazon/everywhere. A general review system works well (ignoring review gaming) when your concern is "Does this shirt fit?" or "What's the build quality?", but fails when one expert review of "This device is fundamentally unsound," gets drowned out by reviews on the more easily testable aspects ("The band is really comfortable!"). A great example would be when Benso…

In my experience too when posting a negative review it can get removed (this was about replacement batteries for lenovo laptops).

I had a review removed on Amazon for mentioning that the company bribed me for a fake positive review.

Re: Bad Smart Watch Authentication

#30
post #15
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How does this help anyone?

The suggestion is that negative reviews are suppressed. Communicating a negative review through a facially positive review would help avoid that.

But this is a negative review that is literally not hidden, to the extent that it is being discussed openly on a site about a completely unrelated topic.
Post reply on HN