Live data from Hacker News

Reverse engineering my #1 Hacker News article

danielwirtz.com

21–30 of 45 posts

Re: Reverse engineering my #1 Hacker News article

#21
My highest rated HN link was a sarcastic troll post about the MacBook Touch Bar in 2016. Nothing I have written since has even gotten close to the same level of attention. Someone reposted a more recent article from my blog over the weekend that gathered 4 upvotes and a few hundred views. It's nice to be noticed but I don't live for attention.

I think that unless you want to form a cabal to get something on the front page, there is a great deal of luck in what takes off on HN (and other similar sites). Unless a post quickly gets those all-important few dozen upvotes it will languish on the second or third page wastelands.

Re: Reverse engineering my #1 Hacker News article

#23
post #13
post #4

I'm torn between "nice writeup" and "ugh, a guide to making viral content on HN?"

One just needs to write "LLM" to get the same effect ;-)

at this point in time, but the rule is too specific.

"One just needs to write $currentTrendingFad to get the same effect"

Not too long ago it could have been crypto/blockchain, or rewriting $app in $lang

That's the thing of viral is it is just trend following, so recognizing the trend helps the changes of going viral

Re: Reverse engineering my #1 Hacker News article

#25
I find it kinda odd some people seem to be against this article.

Sure an off the cuff thought could be an unease with an “guide to going viral on HN” but OP isn’t disclosing any secret hacks or anything from what I’ve read, he just wrote down his creative process and reflected a bit on the virality.

I’m sure a bad actor wanting to go viral on HN could think of this themselves within a days work as well, it’s just a fun article.

Re: Reverse engineering my #1 Hacker News article

#26
I don't want to discourage this type of retrospective, but we (science-type humans) love to look for causal explanations, and can do a great job of reverse-engineering rationale. Even though I think you did do a bunch of things to encourage engagement, it seems like it's more boosted your luck of getting traction from a very small fractional percent to a slightly larger but still very small fractional percent.

Re: Reverse engineering my #1 Hacker News article

#28

Ooops you did it again! Good analysis. It makes me think: we may be living in a golden age when human analysis and thought still produce the most interesting content. Soon AI-assisted content generation processes will take the next evolutionary step: doing proactive analysis and concept development with the human being more like the back seat driver and director. AI powered writing assistants, music generators, life…

Don‘t you think there could be a world where the link to something human might triumph what an AI can generate. For example: Music is not only about how good it sounds. But also a lot about who the singer is. Their history. What they stand for and what story is behind a album or song. With AI, I don’t see that we will ever reach that dimension. Expect maybe when AI becomes sentient?

Yes I believe that authentic human creativity is mostly better than artificial. It's like when drum machines became popular in music in the early 80s there was consternation in some circles that this would be the end of drummers. But good drummers like John Bonham, Tony Allen or Vinnie Colaiuta are like magicians whose artistry cannot be replicated in machine form ... but on the other hand drum machines, and electronic 'machine' music enabled incredible vistas of musical creativity.

So maybe AI in music is just another creative toolset that can be used well or badly. My DAW for music creation has auto mastering powered by AI/ML, it does a good job although not as good as a skilled mastering engineer. AI plugins for music composition in DAWs must already exist, they will inevitably get better and more powerful. So I see it as a phenomenon of AI creeping in to our lives rather than a binary dichotomy.

I do think it's problematic - this whole area of AI disrupting the creative arts, and human endeavor in general. I think it's going to carry on creeping into our human creative processes, as new standards of practice and AI acceptance become the norm. We'll still appreciate live musicianship but we won't completely believe it unless we experience it in a live performance.

I agree, the human perspective will remain crucial. I'm torn between being excited by AI-powered creativity and being turned off by it. I will certainly carry on exploring advanced AI tools for writing, music, visual art, etc. for the time being.

For example, I would love to chat with a bot that has a huge memory and context, like a relationship and collaborator, and to train it over many months of conversations so that it becomes like an authentic extension of my creative brain. Then together we could write some serious shit, I'm sure. I think that in the future there may be books written this way that will come to be considered as great works of literature.

But after I play around with AI tools for some time I think I will get bored and will wish to return to a simpler more organic life. Throw away my phone and pick up a paint brush :-)

Re: Reverse engineering my #1 Hacker News article

#29
This blog post is the proof that HN will become enshittified just like any other platform.

Not because of ads, not because of bots, but because of HN's ever growing userbase.

People publishing content too niche for Reddit, will start tailoring it for the HN crowd, socially engineering it to be posted here and garner more upvotes. HN's home will mostly become crowded with "artificially" upvoted stuff aimed at funneling the HN crowd into an ad-supported website

Re: Reverse engineering my #1 Hacker News article

#30

My highest rated HN link was a sarcastic troll post about the MacBook Touch Bar in 2016. Nothing I have written since has even gotten close to the same level of attention. Someone reposted a more recent article from my blog over the weekend that gathered 4 upvotes and a few hundred views. It's nice to be noticed but I don't live for attention. I think that unless you want to form a cabal to get something on the front…

Looks like the best way to accumulate kudos is to have a bot that watches for new announcements from Apple, OpenAI, etc and then immediately submits the links to HN.
Post reply on HN