so I'm guessing the guys who own the data from the webcrawls are the critical path, guess you need big resources for that. great chart thing here --> https://www.searchenginemap.com/
Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
21–30 of 36 posts
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#22Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#23This is no surprise. It's what we get with a free market and capitalism driving it: Monopolization. And then we can only access what those mono/oligopolies deem profit increasing or at least not hurting.
How would a regulation be like, that in this case, without significant detriment to investment, makes things better? Because I cannot imagine one (not saying there is not, just that myself cannot find it) I’m in a context of an super-regulated EU market, where such things still somewhat happen (well even worst, with people having their homes and theirs relatives searched, because he called dumb a politician), bad wit…
> I’m in a context of an super-regulated EU market, where such things still somewhat happen (well even worst, with people having their homes and theirs relatives searched, because he called dumb a politician), bad with the added problems, namely: there can just not exist such a giant in the EU.
I think state police forces acting beyond their power is an unrelated problem.
Such giants shouldn't exist and be for profit in my view. The issue is that the EU does not block the non-EU giants so Europeans also suffer from the less strict regulation.
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, xe did. Xe explicitly compares it to the findability of one of xyr articles that mentions Squid Game.
The author calls himself male https://www.blogger.com/profile/17977561124307072281 Why that made up pronoun?
Pedantically, all words are made up. I'd assume GP is using it because they see utility in a unambiguously-singular gender-nonspecific pronoun, opposed to the more widespread but somewhat ambiguous singular "they".
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
The author calls himself male https://www.blogger.com/profile/17977561124307072281 Why that made up pronoun?
> Why that made up pronoun? Pedantically, all words are made up. I'd assume GP is using it because they see utility in a unambiguously-singular gender-nonspecific pronoun, opposed to the more widespread but somewhat ambiguous singular "they".
Especially when there is an established gender neutral pronoun: they
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#26I understand the desire for takedown requests on truly infringing content. But there will always be people who exploit those tools for bad faith takedowns, and because this kind of moderation is a loss leader for companies like Google and Bing it seems like they will forever be disincentivized from doing a good job. (We constantly hear similar stories about Youtube copyright strikes.) We have a legal system that's su…
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#27net neutrality briglauer oecd retraction request The pdf is the #1 result on a well known non-US search engine. Stopped updating my millions hits/month blogspot after google insisted blogger's content must be hosted on their servers.
yandex? baidu?
The other one is dreadful. Jack Ma will confirm.
Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#28Re: Vanished from Google/Bing/LinkedIn: a rebuttal of an anti-net neutrality paper
#29net neutrality briglauer oecd retraction request The pdf is the #1 result on a well known non-US search engine. Stopped updating my millions hits/month blogspot after google insisted blogger's content must be hosted on their servers.