Amazon Nova
21–30 of 157 posts
Re: Amazon Nova
#22Since Amazon are building their own frontier models, what's the point of their relationship with Anthropic ?
AWS having customers using its own model probably improves AWS's margins, but having multiple models available (e.g. Anthropic's) improves their ability to capture market share. To date, AWS's efforts (e.g. Q, CodeWhisperer) have not met with universal praise. So for at least for the present, it makes sense to bring customers to AWS to "do AI" whether they're using AWS's models or someone else's.
Re: Amazon Nova
#23It's not clear what the use cases are for this, who is it aimed at.
Re: Amazon Nova
#24Since Amazon are building their own frontier models, what's the point of their relationship with Anthropic ?
Re: Amazon Nova
#25Re: Amazon Nova
#26Re: Amazon Nova
#27 Per 1k tokens Input | Output
Amazon Nova Micro: $0.000035 | $0.00014
Amazon Nova Lite: $0.00006 | $0.00024
Amazon Nova Pro: $0.0008 | $0.0032
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: $0.003 | $0.015
Claude 3.5 Haiku: $0.0008 | $0.0004
Claude 3 Opus: $0.015 | $0.075
Source: AWS Bedrock Pricing https://aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/Re: Amazon Nova
#28It's not clear what the use cases are for this, who is it aimed at.
I'd say, people that need it. Which could be the same for all the other models out there. To create one model that is great at everything is probably a pipedream. Much like creating a multi-tool that can do everything- but can it? I wouldn't trust a multi-tool to take a wheel nut off a wheel, but I would find it useful if I suddenly needed a cross-head screw taken out of something. But then I also have a specific cro…
Nobody needs Reddit hallucinations about programming.