Live data from Hacker News

A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

core77.com

21–30 of 217 posts

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#21

How many hundreds of gallons of water for a bath, then? I didn't see that in the story.

If it works anything like a modern dishwasher, it would use less water than a normal bath or shower.

It looks like it completely fills and drains that big chamber at least a couple of times. If it were just a sprayer mechanism yeah that could be somewhat water-efficient.

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#24

What does the ultrasound do?

On solid objects at least (like jewelry) it dislodges particles of grime / dirt. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasonic_cleaning . No idea if this also works on soft tissue. Edit: the Wikipedia page above says "the ultrasonic action is relatively benign to living tissue but can cause discomfort and skin irritation.". So maybe it was just a gimmick. Ultrasound cleaning was fairly new at the time, so maybe it sound…

Oh, ultrasonics can definitely harm flesh if focused. Yes, I am the guy who tested it with a room humidifier. I knew it would hurt, I did it anyway.

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#25

Truly remarkable creative thinking in a way that does not exist today. This was a year after humans landed on the Moon, and I can understand the inspiration that drove the 70s.

I don’t think we’ve lost the willingness to test products that push human/mechanical boundaries. I think rather it is about not retreading on the learned boundaries that we’ve already established or “solved”. So now we see concepts that test different kinds of human/machine integration. Such as worn AI devices, headsets, and the future idea of brain chips.

As for automatic washers: The idea isn’t totally gone - enclosed automated pet washers are around. (Despite being clearly terrifying for some pets.)

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it works anything like a modern dishwasher, it would use less water than a normal bath or shower.

But if it worked that way (using a small amount of water over and over to clean) would be gross and unsanitary in this case. One could filter it but that costs a lot of energy and changing a filter weekly on your shower pod would not be very green.

it's not unsanitary on your plates, why should it be on your skin?

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#27
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But if it worked that way (using a small amount of water over and over to clean) would be gross and unsanitary in this case. One could filter it but that costs a lot of energy and changing a filter weekly on your shower pod would not be very green.

it's not unsanitary on your plates, why should it be on your skin?

Your plates can be washed with temperatures that would scald you and with chemicals that dissolve your skin.

But you don’t want to sanitise your skin, just get the dirt off, so I don’t see any real issues.

Post reply on HN