Live data from Hacker News

Four dead in fire as Tesla doors fail to open after crash

myelectricsparks.com

21–30 of 188 posts

Re: Four dead in fire as Tesla doors fail to open after crash

#21
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

* Remove the mat from the bottom of the rear door pocket. * Press the red tab to remove the access door. * Pull the mechanical release cable forward. It doesn't feel very panic friendly to have the emergency release hidden?

Especially egregious considering it's likely kids will be back there. And the release is in a place thats probably impossible to get to from the front seat (in the model Y)

Munroe on YT complained about exactly that 4 years ago :/

Re: Four dead in fire as Tesla doors fail to open after crash

#23

The model Y's inability to roll down its rear windows is another safety liability. I had to vomit out of an Uber and had much difficulty getting my head out the tiny opening.

That’s not really specific to Tesla. Lots of cars have rear windows that only hinge open slightly

Re: Four dead in fire as Tesla doors fail to open after crash

#24
post #12

I'm waiting for a new regulation that requires all EVs to have a sledgehammer in the passenger cabin.

How about a simple tiny safety hammer instead. The ones a lot of cars (at least here in the EU) are already outfitted with. As others have pointed out, any car should have such a hammer.

Re: Four dead in fire as Tesla doors fail to open after crash

#25
post #13
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

why are the doors electronically controlled to start with? is it cost savings?

They use frameless windows, so the electronic release slightly lowers them to avoid them scraping the door frame.

Why do they want frameless windows?

Re: Four dead in fire as Tesla doors fail to open after crash

#27
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They use frameless windows, so the electronic release slightly lowers them to avoid them scraping the door frame.

Why do they want frameless windows?

Frameless windows are aesthetically pleasing to many people. Tesla aren’t alone in that preference, they are just one of the few brands that use frameless by default even on the lowest end vehicles they sell, so there’s a higher number out there.

Re: Four dead in fire as Tesla doors fail to open after crash

#28
post #2

Another similar incident happened around a week after that one: https://www.channel3000.com/news/dane-county-sheriffs-office... . One thing to note is that the car doors in Teslas are electrically controlled and a different failsafe method of opening the doors is required when the electrical system isn't working. Here's the steps for manually opening the Model Y's rear doors (car in the story the post links to): http…

Lexus’s latest cars have electrically controlled doors as well. The mechanical failover is a bit better mind you, you have to pull twice instead of pushing, but I am not sure how panic proof it is.

I live techlnology but IMHO it is overdone in modern cars. Please bring back tactile and mechanical controls where possible.

Re: Four dead in fire as Tesla doors fail to open after crash

#29
post #12

I'm waiting for a new regulation that requires all EVs to have a sledgehammer in the passenger cabin.

For a long time, I lived in an area with a lot of creeks and rivers. Since my first car with electric windows and locks, I keep something like this:

https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasics-Emergency-Cutter-Window-...

in the glove box or center console. Call me paranoid, but I don't trust the electronic system to work if my car is sinking.

Re: Four dead in fire as Tesla doors fail to open after crash

#30
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They use frameless windows, so the electronic release slightly lowers them to avoid them scraping the door frame.

Why do they want frameless windows?

Why do they want glued-on RAM and SSDs?
Post reply on HN