No one can expect this to stand. A cursory glance at the Wiki gave me "In 2005, the Liteye HMD was introduced for ground combat troops as a rugged, waterproof lightweight display that clips into a standard US PVS-14 military helmet mount." That's actually on the field a year before Apple even applied for this patent.
Looking further back for potential sources of prior art, I seem to remember seeing a picture of and/or reading about a very early stereoscopic head-mounted display that used two ultracompact CRT displays. However, given the mixed bag of Apple's recent successes and failures, combined with the general ham-handedness of the patent system, anything is possible.
Google Glass: Apple Granted Patent for Head-Mounted Display
21–30 of 33 posts
Re: Google Glass: Apple Granted Patent for Head-Mounted Display
#22No one can expect this to stand. A cursory glance at the Wiki gave me "In 2005, the Liteye HMD was introduced for ground combat troops as a rugged, waterproof lightweight display that clips into a standard US PVS-14 military helmet mount." That's actually on the field a year before Apple even applied for this patent.
Did you ever expect that to stand? I think we should be assume the worst now..
Re: Google Glass: Apple Granted Patent for Head-Mounted Display
#23The actual problem that the patent is intended to solve, for those who'd rather comment than RTFA: "A problem with HMDs, primarily HMDs that are not of the see-through kind, is that the image on the display in front of each eye fills the central but not the peripheral field of view of the user. Consequently, the visual experience is similar to looking into a box or tunnel having a small screen at a distance. Peripher…
Re: Google Glass: Apple Granted Patent for Head-Mounted Display
#24Re: Google Glass: Apple Granted Patent for Head-Mounted Display
#25The patent actually refers to an apparently novel method of handling peripheral vision in stereoscopic HMDs, in order to remove the 'tunnel' or 'box' effect and increase the comfort of wearing HMDs for a long period of time. At present this is something which no existing stereoscopic HMD (or indeed, Google Glass) handles to my knowledge.
It's also worth noting that existing stereoscopic HMDs, while impressive, have been known to cause discomfort such as headaches in some people when worn for more than a few hours.
So there doesn't appear to be any link to Project Glass which, it should be noted, has also been patented by Google. This is just linkbait.
Re: Google Glass: Apple Granted Patent for Head-Mounted Display
#26If Apple turns around and sues Google using this patent, I think it will be time to unplug completely and join the people in the mountains looking to escape EM radiation. And really, they had to add CRT displays to the patent? Seriously Apple, CRT? Did Apple figure out a magical new way of getting "retina" resolution with a millimeter-long tube that can somehow feed the entire field-of-vision of the person wearing it…
And as I said before, I see nothing in this patent that applies to Google Glass.
Re: Google Glass: Apple Granted Patent for Head-Mounted Display
#27No one can expect this to stand. A cursory glance at the Wiki gave me "In 2005, the Liteye HMD was introduced for ground combat troops as a rugged, waterproof lightweight display that clips into a standard US PVS-14 military helmet mount." That's actually on the field a year before Apple even applied for this patent.
Re: Google Glass: Apple Granted Patent for Head-Mounted Display
#28The actual problem that the patent is intended to solve, for those who'd rather comment than RTFA: "A problem with HMDs, primarily HMDs that are not of the see-through kind, is that the image on the display in front of each eye fills the central but not the peripheral field of view of the user. Consequently, the visual experience is similar to looking into a box or tunnel having a small screen at a distance. Peripher…
Their solution also only involves projecting a solid colour into the peripheral view. Actual peripheral view for our eyes can make out details and shapes, so it is not to emulate vision but to "reduce fatigue."
Re: Google Glass: Apple Granted Patent for Head-Mounted Display
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Motorola, HTC and Samsung were all making smartphones long before Apple was. IIRC, they are all now being sued by Apple over, among other things, at least one feature that their smartphones had before the iPhone was even announced. So how's that previous history working out for them? I'll also highlight my assumption: Apple's patent abuse continues unchecked. In other words, Apple's software patent assaults are deliv…
What are you talking about ? I was talking about Apple going after Linux.
To take just one example: the ultrabooks that Apple could easily try to go after with their "wedge" design patent, can run Linux, too, not just Windows. And that's clearly a form factor many people consider nice. Granted, this is a different area of competition than smartphones, but I specifically talked about Apple extending their patent assaults to new areas if their patent abuse remained unchecked.
Do you think Apple extending their legal strategy like that wouldn't have an impact on the availability of nice hardware to run Linux on? It seems obvious to me that it would. After all, there's more than one way to go after Linux.
Re: Google Glass: Apple Granted Patent for Head-Mounted Display
#30This is poor from Wired, there's nothing in this patent that would seem to represent a threat to Google Glass. After all, this is not in any way a patent on Head-Mounted Displays as a concept, as those have been in use in militaries since the 1980s, which Apple's patent references. The patent actually refers to an apparently novel method of handling peripheral vision in stereoscopic HMDs, in order to remove the 'tunn…
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57434403-76/google-patents...
I remember reading a few posts like these about Google's new patents for Google Glass.