Live data from Hacker News

USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

usgs.gov

21–30 of 237 posts

Re: USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

#21
From the paper's method section, a bit more about which type of ML algo was used:

An RF machine-learning model was developed to predict lithium concentrations in Smackover Formation brines throughout southern Arkansas. The model was developed by (i) assigning explanatory variables to brine samples collected at wells, (ii) tuning the RF model to make predictions at wells and assess model performance, (iii) mapping spatially continuous predictions of lithium concentrations across the Reynolds oolite unit of the Smackover Formation in southern Arkansas, and (iv) inspecting the model for explanatory variable importance and influence. Initial model tuning used the tidymodels framework (52) in R (53) to test XGBoost, K-nearest neighbors, and RF algorithms; RF models consistently had higher accuracy and lower bias, so they were used to train the final model and predict lithium.

Explanatory variables used to tune the RF model included geologic, geochemical, and temperature information for Jurassic and Cretaceous units. The geologic framework of the model domain is expected to influence brine chemistry both spatially and with depth. Explanatory variables used to train the RF model must be mapped across the model domain to create spatially continuous predictions of lithium. Thus, spatially continuous subsurface geologic information is key, although these digital resources are often difficult to acquire.

Interesting to me that RF performed better the XGBoost, would have expected at least a similar outcome if tuned correctly.

Re: USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was disappointed in that line. They could’ve mentioned it used a random forest, which is much more informative. “ML is a type of AI” isn’t even a cocktail party understanding of the topic.

For a layperson, this is an accessible and directionally correct definition. For the HN audience, of course this is 'technically incorrect'. The article was written for the (larger) general public. I am also glad they didn't squeeze in a word salad of LLMs and quantum technology and instead stuck to 'it's just standard ML'.

The only informational dividable from the statement is "we used a computer to analyze data".

Re: USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

#27
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would assume any positive effects are balanced out by living in Arkansas.

My only experience with Arkansas was waking up to a speeding ticket at 3 in the morning. Who puts out a speed trap at 3 in the fucking morning? But if it’s anything like Oklahoma…

Um, why were you waking up while driving at 3 in the morning?

Re: USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Potentially. See "Lithium in drinking water linked with lower suicide rates" [1]. [1] https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/lithium-in-drinking-water-linked-...

I would assume any positive effects are balanced out by living in Arkansas.

People downvoted you to the point that your comment is grayed out and about to be hidden but there is hardly metric by which Arkansas is not in the bottom ten on a list of states.

Infant mortality rate? 3rd most deadly for babies.

Poverty rate? 7th poorest.

Homicide rate? 7th most dangerous.

Obesity rate? 3rd fattest.

Practically any map of any measurable statistic where states are colored red for "bad" and green for "good" Arkansas will be a deep, blood, red.

But it is rude to point that out.

Re: USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

#29
post #26

Love to see a project that uses bog standard ML techniques and doesn't call them AI. Respect.

ML is one particular field in the overall area of AI.

Isn’t it a critical component of everything currently sporting anything remotely close to a legit “AI” label? I wouldn’t call cows “one part of a broader beef ecosystem” for example. They’re fundamental to it.

Re: USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

#30
post #27
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My only experience with Arkansas was waking up to a speeding ticket at 3 in the morning. Who puts out a speed trap at 3 in the fucking morning? But if it’s anything like Oklahoma…

Um, why were you waking up while driving at 3 in the morning?

Some cars have seats for up to seven people, including the driver.
Post reply on HN