I've seen firsthand how PE ruins startups. I joined a seed co and our founder went with a PE firm rather than a VC for our next round. The VCs were upfront about job cuts but the PE investors did not say anything until they took over. Needless to say, the founder got a good paycheck but we were left holding the bag. It was a bloodbath and they completely ruined the culture, product, morale, and any semblance of growt…
It sounds unusual for a seed-stage company (I assume that’s what you mean) to seek funding from private equity. Did the company already have significant revenue and profitability? Why did the founder go for private equity rather than VC.. was the founder basically looking to sell/exit at that point?
Private equity ruins tech companies
21–30 of 49 posts
Re: Private equity ruins tech companies
#22Is there a company out there that has survived a gutting by PE?
Last I heard Barnes and Noble was doing pretty good: https://www.theverge.com/23642104/barnes-and-noble-amazon-bo...
Re: Private equity ruins tech companies
#23Re: Private equity ruins tech companies
#24I've seen firsthand how PE ruins startups. I joined a seed co and our founder went with a PE firm rather than a VC for our next round. The VCs were upfront about job cuts but the PE investors did not say anything until they took over. Needless to say, the founder got a good paycheck but we were left holding the bag. It was a bloodbath and they completely ruined the culture, product, morale, and any semblance of growt…
Isn't venture capital merely a kind of private equity?
Re: Private equity ruins tech companies
#25The title could be generalized to "Private equity firms ruins companies"
Re: Private equity ruins tech companies
#26Is there a company out there that has survived a gutting by PE?
Re: Private equity ruins tech companies
#27This is not really news. The question is, what there is to do? I think that it is logical to sell your company to highest bidder when you want to exit, and often the highest bidder ends up being a PE firm.
Some founders are more than happy to sell at a lower price if they think the lower bidder will be a good custodian of the company.
“Good custodian” is relative, but often means things like treating existing employees well, trying to maintain the best parts of the company culture, keeping clients happy, keeping the quality of the product or service of a company at a high level, etc.
Sometimes founders realize that an extra bag of money on top of the multiple bags they are already getting won’t buy them self-respect.
Fiduciary responsibility can make this murky sometimes, but that’s a cop out more often than not, imho.
Re: Private equity ruins tech companies
#28In a former life I evaluated WordPress, Drupal, and some other open source CMSs. Drupal seemed remarkably terrible. Maybe I just wasn't the target user...but UI, UX, and DX all seemed blighted and the ecosystem much less vibrant than WP's. Came away thinking it was a vestige of yesteryear, and not something in which to invest any time, energy, or money.
Maybe that's a harsh take on Drupal, but one already-seemingly-in-decline property from which one PE firm extracted value... if over-extraction and under-investment really is a systemic problem of PE, there must be many more, much better examples.
Re: Private equity ruins tech companies
#29It would be good to explain the difference between PE funding and VC funding.
Re: Private equity ruins tech companies
#30The title could be generalized to "Private equity firms ruins companies"
I haven't been to the dentist in 4 years and I'm hell-bent on finding one that is not part of PE or any type of corporate ownership. I'm prepared to drive to rural areas or hours away because I will not trust that their incentives are aligned with mine.