> in fact, it forms less than 2% of all the bacteria that cause caries I tracked down the chain of citations here. The directly cited article ( https://www.nature.com/articles/sj.bdj.2018.81 ) says the following: "These caries ecological concepts have been confirmed by recent DNA- and RNA-based molecular studies that have uncovered an extraordinarily diverse microbial ecosystem, where S. mutans accounts for a very sm…
The safety concerns sound circular in an almost Kafkaesque manner. From what I can tell, a strain of the bacteria was found in the wild that created less acid and seemed to lead to less carries. So people thought it needed to be safer, so they instead created a genetically modified version of the bacteria. But now it couldn’t even be tested in the wild because the “safer” version had so many unknowns that even lettin…
That was after they decided it needed to outcompete the existing bacterium and added a mutagen to kill it off.