Live data from Hacker News

Three questions to turn the table during technical interviews

bellmar.medium.com

21–30 of 114 posts

Re: Three questions to turn the table during technical interviews

#21
post #7

> In every round, the interviewer should leave with the impression that you answered their questions as honestly as possible because you’re looking for the right fit, not just a job. This is precisely what I despise about "job interviews". What you ask in the "Do you have any questions?" section of the interview should be irrelevant. I don't want to have to ask questions when I don't care about the answers just becau…

I suppose it depends on the role, but IME as a hiring interviewer, that phase of the interview can important. Do you truly not care to learn anything about the company you will spend the next 2,3,5,10 years with?

[deleted]

Re: Three questions to turn the table during technical interviews

#23
Not sure the author realized this, but there's an interesting contradiction here.

> In hiring, we standardize questions to help mitigate bias and make more accurate comparisons across a group of candidates.

> The people on the ground, close to the problem are often your best bet, but organizations find it difficult to handle anything they can’t standardize and normalize.

Standardizing is more fair, but at the cost (or benefit) of minimizing interesting outcomes.

Re: Three questions to turn the table during technical interviews

#24
“There’s an IC sitting out there who just had an amazing idea for a new feature/product. What happens?”

Sounds like a good question, but the answer doesn't really matter, because it depends on whether the business actually wants to implement the idea. And if they do, it needs to sound like it's coming from an executive, because if it's not, they'll be embarrassed and try to crush the idea. So if the dev really wants the idea to get into product, they should be funneling the idea through their manager or through a product or sales back-channel.

“Tell me about your last major migration. How long did it take and how long did you say it was going to take before you started?”

Bad question, because they always take longer than they expect and always run into problems, and if they don't they were just lucky. You're asking them to either embarrass themselves to you in the interview, or lie. Not going to give them great feels to remember when they think about your candidacy. Maybe ask them about migrations to see how often they do them, but don't lead them to tell you something specific.

“Let’s say I’m the person you hire. 6 months have gone by, what’s different?”

> You’d be surprised how often I ask this question and the answer I get back is something like “you’ll be here and doing the job”

Yeah, because this is a really bad question. It's not their job to make you have an impact. It's your job to make an impact. That's why it's a job. The question should be them asking you what you will do in those 6 months to make a difference.

Re: Three questions to turn the table during technical interviews

#25
post #7

> In every round, the interviewer should leave with the impression that you answered their questions as honestly as possible because you’re looking for the right fit, not just a job. This is precisely what I despise about "job interviews". What you ask in the "Do you have any questions?" section of the interview should be irrelevant. I don't want to have to ask questions when I don't care about the answers just becau…

I suppose it depends on the role, but IME as a hiring interviewer, that phase of the interview can important. Do you truly not care to learn anything about the company you will spend the next 2,3,5,10 years with?

For somebody who's unemployed, especially somebody who's been unemployed a while (very common in this market), the main thing you care about is getting employed again.

I imagine somebody who's currently employed wants to know that the company is better than the place they're currently at before they'd accept an offer. But sometimes "better" can be a very low bar to clear because their current company might be awful.

In other words, evaluating the candidate by their questions is just bias towards those who are already in good situations. Somebody being unemployed or employed in a toxic environment doesn't mean there's anything wrong with them especially in an economy where companies continue to lay people off at random.

Re: Three questions to turn the table during technical interviews

#27
Treating the interview as two-way is good, and how it should be. A couple points:

> When people struggle to answer it you still reap the rewards of letting them know that you’re not just looking for a job, you care about being successful at their company.

If you publicize that in a Medium post targeting HN-like audience, aren't you just increasing the number of people will ask that question just to "reap the rewards" of signalling (falsely) something they think is positive?

> Ask questions like: “How is the company responding to challenges from disruptors like X and Y in this space?” or “What are your thoughts on potential regulation?”

If you've been having a pretty candid conversation, these questions can trigger rehearsed public/investor-facing talking point answers, which is fine, but might also knock the person back into a less-candid mode.

Re: Three questions to turn the table during technical interviews

#28
I usually try to ask these

What are the bad things about this job?

What's the average tenure on the team, how many people have left the team recently and why?

How does this team & company compare with other places you've worked?

(second or third round) How many other people are being interviewed and how do I compare?

Re: Three questions to turn the table during technical interviews

#29
post #7

> In every round, the interviewer should leave with the impression that you answered their questions as honestly as possible because you’re looking for the right fit, not just a job. This is precisely what I despise about "job interviews". What you ask in the "Do you have any questions?" section of the interview should be irrelevant. I don't want to have to ask questions when I don't care about the answers just becau…

If you don't have any interest why do you want to work at that organization? You just want a check? That's not a good way to spend half your waking hours during the work week.

If you aren't already wealthy, you're probably working because "you just want a check". Even if the job you want is to own your own company, you still have to work until you have enough savings. This is how the world has always worked for most of the population in every human society that has ever existed.

Re: Three questions to turn the table during technical interviews

#30

> These days, the roles I consider are in leadership so if we lack vision and a clear understanding of our value I’m usually empowered to fix that. If you’re interviewing for a more IC role, your hiring manager and teammates being unable to communicate expectations and success criteria is obviously a bigger concern. So, the author doesn't seem to consider IC role a leadership role. I see, ok.

By definition they aren't. That's what the I stands for. Individual as in you aren't leading anyone else.

that isn’t mutually exclusive with leadership. ICs lead by example and mentorship. the fact that they’re not managing people doesn’t preclude being a leader at a company. the way i’ve heard it put for staff+ engs that i like is that they’re managers without reports.

but to speak to GP’s point, they are being a bit overly sensitive. “leadership” in the context of the article likely means C-suite or director level, which usually IS mutually exclusive with an IC role. (and maybe that’s what you meant, sorry for ‘splaining if so)

Post reply on HN