Live data from Hacker News

CalcGPT

calcgpt.io

21–30 of 54 posts

Re: CalcGPT

#22
post #2

It's great to see a _real_ AI application among all this media noise ;-). Seriously though, this is wonderful satire. I asked 88x10 and it returned an HTML meta tag.

The two sliders at the top are the best. The most customizable calculator to my knowledge.

Re: CalcGPT

#23
I'm sorry but this falls flat for me. GPT4 routinely can answer impressive math questions for me (college-level):

- What diameter steel wire would I need to be rated for a weight of 500lbs?

- How many digits would a ID need to be (using 36 characters) to have a 1/10^20 chance of collision over 1 billion random IDs?

- If I have a list of a million times (say durations of a web request) and they follow a normal distribution, and I take a sample of 1 million of those, how close would the average of my .1% sample be to the true average of the billion?

- Suppose in D&D I am told to roll 20 d6, but instead of rolling that many dice I want to roll just two (larger) dice and add a constant. Which standard D&D dice might give the closest variance and what is the constant?

Re: CalcGPT

#24
I’m enjoying experimenting with nonsensical math:

> Apple * dog

> CalcGPT: Apple Mini − dog or dog. Total= Apple Dog Mini MiniDog=49

I was wondering if math of words would produce the embedding of the operation of those words, but nope :)

Re: CalcGPT

#25
This is the first time I have come across Calvin Liang, but I’m already a big fan. Their artist’s statement manages to be very funny while making a point. I like today.

Re: CalcGPT

#26
post #24

I’m enjoying experimenting with nonsensical math: > Apple * dog > CalcGPT: Apple Mini − dog or dog. Total= Apple Dog Mini MiniDog=49 I was wondering if math of words would produce the embedding of the operation of those words, but nope :)

> Hot + dog

CalcGTP: Three dogs holding a hot dog with tails pointing to infinity

Re: CalcGPT

#27
post #23

I'm sorry but this falls flat for me. GPT4 routinely can answer impressive math questions for me (college-level): - What diameter steel wire would I need to be rated for a weight of 500lbs? - How many digits would a ID need to be (using 36 characters) to have a 1/10^20 chance of collision over 1 billion random IDs? - If I have a list of a million times (say durations of a web request) and they follow a normal distrib…

It is for sure just a funny hobby project, but your statement had me intrigued:

> Suppose in D&D I am told to roll 20 d6, but instead of rolling that many dice I want to roll just two (larger) dice and add a constant. Which standard D&D dice might give the closest variance and what is the constant?

Interestingly, ChatGPT 4o tells me to use 2d19 + 51, even after correcting it and asking for larger dice. Impressive math for sure but not worth much if it doesn't respect constraints. I guess I could try again until it stumbles upon the right answer, but it's all to say it's not quite there yet.

Re: CalcGPT

#28
I think there is a bug here...

8888888×965 = 965 according to this site with temperature = 0 or 3.63... with temperature = 1

On the other hand, GPT4 gets it correct:

https://chatgpt.com/share/34007f39-cfa8-46c8-bda3-9f641affc1...

Even when I instruct it not to think about it:

https://chatgpt.com/share/cb22c9dc-1549-4d00-a498-c889f6822b...

Re: CalcGPT

#29
Entered 42

The 8 solutions I got while clicking on regenerate:

    3.33333333333
    42, so the point your talking about is 3.3 (Accuracy is
    3 Additionally, 3 coincided with John 3:16 , "$3
    1
    3.33333333333
    42
    42+1=3+1=4=42+1=43
    2×5
Not so sure what I just did. Results are copy-pasted as-is

Re: CalcGPT

#30
This is neat, but most people are going to miss "GPT-3 (babbage-002)". Using a rudimentary, outdated model seems disingenuous when making any kind of point about AI.
Post reply on HN