Live data from Hacker News

AI crawlers need to be more respectful

about.readthedocs.com

21–30 of 128 posts

Re: AI crawlers need to be more respectful

#21
post #5

Just 2 buggy crawlers seems not that many, sure they each had large impact, but given that there are likely hundreds if not thousands of such crawlers out there it's a rather small number. It seems that most crawlers are actually respectful.

How many foundation AI companies are there? 2 is a pretty big chunk of that pie.

I think there are a thousand wannabe companies all trying to suck up as much data as they can; not a sustainable situation in any way.

Re: AI crawlers need to be more respectful

#23
While the crawling is disrespectful, it seems RTD could find a cheaper host for their files. At my work we have a 10G business fiber line and serve >1PB per month for around $1,500. Takes 90% of the load off our cloud services. Took me just a couple weeks to set up everything.

Re: AI crawlers need to be more respectful

#25
post #20

Shouldn't all sites have some kind of bandwidth / cost limiting in place? Not to say that AI crawlers shouldn't be more careful, but there are always malicious actors on the internet, seems foolish not to have some kind of defense in place

It's harder to do right then you think. The first dynamic bandwidth (and concurrent connection) limiter that I wrote was to protect a site against Google in part!

Re: AI crawlers need to be more respectful

#26
post #5

Just 2 buggy crawlers seems not that many, sure they each had large impact, but given that there are likely hundreds if not thousands of such crawlers out there it's a rather small number. It seems that most crawlers are actually respectful.

I used to run a site with a huge number of pages that had high running costs but low revenue.

The only web crawler that did anything for me was Google, as Google sent an appreciable amount of traffic. Referrers from Bing were almost undetectable: the joke among my black hat SEO friends at the time was that you could rank for money keywords like "buy wow gold" and get 10 hits. Then there were the Chinese crawlers like Baidu that would crawl at 10x the rate of Google but send zero referrers. And then there were crawlers looking for copyrighted images that cost me money to accommodate even if they never sent me cease and desist letters.

As much as I hate the Google monopoly I couldn't afford having my site crawled like that without any benefit to me.

It's an awful situation for the long term though because it prevents new entrants. Right now I am thinking about a new search engine for a vertical where a huge number of products are available from different vendors and when you do find results from Google they are sold out at least 70% of the time. I hate to think it's going to get harder to make something.

Re: AI crawlers need to be more respectful

#27
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How many foundation AI companies are there? 2 is a pretty big chunk of that pie.

I think there are a thousand wannabe companies all trying to suck up as much data as they can; not a sustainable situation in any way.

There was a paper about webcrawlers circa 2000 that pointed out that the vast majority of academics who ran webcrawlers never published a paper based on their work.

Re: AI crawlers need to be more respectful

#28
Had a conversation with a firm that wanted a distributed scraper built, and they really did not care about site usage policies.

You would be fooling yourselves if you think such a firm cared about robots.txt or page tags.

We warned them they would be sued eventually, to contact the site owners for legal access to the data, and issued a hard pass on the project. Probably they assumed if the indexing process was out of another jurisdiction their domestic firm wouldn't be liable for theft of service or copyright infringement.

It was my understanding AI/ML does not change legal obligations in business, but the firm probably found someone to build that dubious project eventually...

Spider traps and rate-limiting are good options too. =3

Re: AI crawlers need to be more respectful

#29
post #3
post #2

What amazes me that none of this is surprising, all this behavior (not just what's described in the post) is on par with what the companies are doing, and have been doing for decades... And yet there will be many people, including here on HN, who will just cheer these companies on because they spit out an "opensource model" or a 10-dollars-a-month subscription

Do you feel the same way about Google spidering for their commercial search engine?

I don't.

Just 3 AI spiders put more load on our servers than all search engine spiders and all human traffic combined.

Some numbers I have handy from before I blocked the bots:

ClaudeBot drove more requests through our Redmine in a month than it saw in the combined 5 years prior to ClaudeBot.

Bytespider accounted for 59% of the total traffic to our Git server.

Amazonbot accounted for 21% of the total traffic to our Git server.

Google has never even been close to breaking out of the single-digit-percentages of any metric.

Re: AI crawlers need to be more respectful

#30
post #23

While the crawling is disrespectful, it seems RTD could find a cheaper host for their files. At my work we have a 10G business fiber line and serve >1PB per month for around $1,500. Takes 90% of the load off our cloud services. Took me just a couple weeks to set up everything.

They normally aren't serving from webservices but from subsidized CDNs.
Post reply on HN