Live data from Hacker News

Don Estridge: A misfit who built the IBM PC

every.to

21–30 of 135 posts

Re: Don Estridge: A misfit who built the IBM PC

#23

>> His divisional heads always had the same answer. Microcomputers—home computing—were a fad. They were low-cost and low-profit. Let others scrabble around in the metaphorical dirt of home computing. The real money was in the markets that IBM’s divisions already dominated—selling vast mainframes and minicomputer systems to large businesses. Cary was even told to buy Atari, which by then had established itself as Amer…

> Not sure how IBM folks could not see this opportunity just because it was smaller scale than "what they did"

They thought it was a fad - that centralized systems (coincidentally, the machines they made) would be the computing platform that people would pay-per-minute/pay-per-hour/pay-per-month to access remotely. They wanted to be an information utility - a supplier to all - instead of selling a small, low margin box for one-time revenue.

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair

Re: Don Estridge: A misfit who built the IBM PC

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Absolutely horrible show and I advise people to not waste their time.

Why is that?

The acting is horrible. The writing is terrible. The story veers off into areas unrelated. There is a moment of a thoroughly unrelated homosexual encounter. (What was the point of that?!) Moments I know that are so really stretched too far to be believable. And on and on.

So bad I couldn't finish the series.

Re: Don Estridge: A misfit who built the IBM PC

#25
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Absolutely horrible show and I advise people to not waste their time.

Such insightful commentary! I didn't find it a perfect show--especially latterly--but it captured a lot of the era, such as COMDEX, pretty well.

As insightful as the comment I replied to.

Re: Don Estridge: A misfit who built the IBM PC

#27

>> His divisional heads always had the same answer. Microcomputers—home computing—were a fad. They were low-cost and low-profit. Let others scrabble around in the metaphorical dirt of home computing. The real money was in the markets that IBM’s divisions already dominated—selling vast mainframes and minicomputer systems to large businesses. Cary was even told to buy Atari, which by then had established itself as Amer…

None of those division heads were trying to honestly assess the microcomputer market. They were trying to stay in harmony with opinion at their level and higher in IBM.

That's what you get at that level in a company that big. Anyone who is two or more levels from the top of the org chart and also two or more levels from the bottom lives in a reality that consists entirely of the attitudes and opinions of other people, weighted by each person's ability to impact their career. If they saw that the building they were in was on fire, their thought process would go something like: "Bob isn't here today because he's at that sales meeting. When he hears about the fire he'll downplay it as something minor, so I shouldn't evacuate or he'll think less of me. But Bob's boss Don is here. If Don evacuates and I don't, that might Don feel embarrassed and emasculated, and he'll take it out on Bob. So I need to evacuate if and only if Don evacuates. Bob won't mind me evacuating if Don does it. But Don's office is on the other side of that wall of approaching flames. Shit. My only chance is if he's in a meeting on this side of the building, so I can track him down and see what he's doing. Let me check his calendar real quick...."

Re: Don Estridge: A misfit who built the IBM PC

#28

For people who are interested in this era, Halt and Catch Fire is a terrific portrayal of the sorts of characters and battles that defined it, albeit from more of a startup perspective. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWrioRji60A

Fantastic show, highly recommend.

I agree.

Re: Don Estridge: A misfit who built the IBM PC

#30
Classic example of Worse is Better.

All competing architectures were better than IBM PC architecture, PC BIOS was bad, chosen processor instruction set was the worst, MS-DOS operating system was bad. Only the keyboard was good.

What made it winner was open architecture, 80-column screen and IBM name.

Post reply on HN