I was afraid of this. Now, it's a matter of time before Google search will get even worse as SEO hustlers push more of their useless crap to the top now that internal algorithm data has been published. Guess I should look into that Kagi thing people keep mentioning.
[flagged]
Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real
21–30 of 78 posts
Re: Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real
#22Re: Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
But would be difficult to build a lot of websites which all meet the threshold for specific keywords. The thresholds don't have to be particularly low. In fact it's better if they require a certain amount of work to meet. So maybe only a relatively small number of websites would qualify for a specific niche keyword but the idea is that, among those, they are ranked randomly. You'd probably have to use AI to figure ou…
Do you remember those autogenerated websites that were just giant lists of all words? Those disappeared many years ago, but if you made search ranking random, they'd come right back.
Still many copy/paste sites around. Crawl data, put a skin on top, publish on stolen domain to make it legit, clickfarm away!
Re: Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real
#24Re: Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
I asked ChatGPT to tell me how to get away with murder in the style of a recipe blog and it (surprisingly) did a bang-up job: https://chatgpt.com/share/b738b68d-8294-4a2c-87ff-f95a6e2d91... I did this after simply wanting to know how much powdered sugar to put in whipped cream and getting frustrated at trying to scroll through 3 blogs just to find the ingredient list for something so simple. Eventually I just asked C…
Your link doesn't seem to work.
Re: Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real
#26Any good summaries about what was revealed in the leak?
- They claimed that clicks were not a ranking factor, it turns out it is.
- Also turns out that they are using Chrome data for ranking purposes (Not good for the ongoing lawsuit)
- There is also a field called something like "is small personal site" and it presumed that those sites are penalized.
You can find a summary here: https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/1d2gllz/google_caught_...
Re: Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real
#27The main lies that were uncovered is that they are indeed using clicks, and chrome browser data for ranking purposes.
Summary of their lies here: https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/1d2gllz/google_caught_...
Re: Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real
#28I was afraid of this. Now, it's a matter of time before Google search will get even worse as SEO hustlers push more of their useless crap to the top now that internal algorithm data has been published. Guess I should look into that Kagi thing people keep mentioning.
Re: Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real
#29I was afraid of this. Now, it's a matter of time before Google search will get even worse as SEO hustlers push more of their useless crap to the top now that internal algorithm data has been published. Guess I should look into that Kagi thing people keep mentioning.
2, even if some of this wasnt widely known, its not like you can take advantage of it overnight. Theres no quick hack to building a trustworthy domain or getting lots of trustworthy links for example
Re: Google confirms the leaked Search documents are real
#30I was afraid of this. Now, it's a matter of time before Google search will get even worse as SEO hustlers push more of their useless crap to the top now that internal algorithm data has been published. Guess I should look into that Kagi thing people keep mentioning.
Isn't Kagi dependant on Google for their results? Doesn't seem tenable in the long-term to me.