Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or alternatively, block port 22 entirely on your firewall and use something like Tailscale to access the machine. Of course, now your attack surface includes Tailscale, which has had it's own vulns in the past, but I think blocking all public traffic ends up being much stronger than any weaknesses Tailscale may introduce.
Isn't that just the same thing in different clothes? Just a different protocol offering the same features of authentication and encryption - often using exactly the same primitives? Is it "Security through obscurity" assuming fewer people are attacking vpn protocols that than ssh? And I'm not sure that's even true
Visualizing malicious IP addresses
21–30 of 124 posts
Re: Visualizing malicious IP addresses
#22I always wondered how the IPs like this 180.101.88.232 from this block: ISP ChinaNet Jiangsu Province Network Domain Name chinatelecom.com.cn Continue to be the source of thousands of ssh password login attempts for years and years on end. It's not a big deal, I use a tarpit on all ssh with 2FA on the one I use, but it seems ridiculous that some participants of the internet don't give a shit about the rest of the wor…
Those probably belong to a CGNAT with many machines behind it.
Re: Visualizing malicious IP addresses
#23Fun. You could also try putting the data into Google's data studio (now looker) to visualize them in an interactive map you can publish. Add things like size of dot corresponding to number of attempts, add reverse DNS/whois info to the info bubble, etc. Wonder how much came from residential vs business ip space. https://lookerstudio.google.com
Re: Visualizing malicious IP addresses
#24I always wondered how the IPs like this 180.101.88.232 from this block: ISP ChinaNet Jiangsu Province Network Domain Name chinatelecom.com.cn Continue to be the source of thousands of ssh password login attempts for years and years on end. It's not a big deal, I use a tarpit on all ssh with 2FA on the one I use, but it seems ridiculous that some participants of the internet don't give a shit about the rest of the wor…
Re: Visualizing malicious IP addresses
#25Re: Visualizing malicious IP addresses
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Those probably belong to a CGNAT with many machines behind it.
Yes, I assumed it is an exit point of the great firewall or something like that, but they do so much packet inspection, they could easily block them. It's not like it's hard to see them.
Re: Visualizing malicious IP addresses
#27[flagged]
Re: Visualizing malicious IP addresses
#28Are these because the bad guys are in there or just because of the population size?
China, India, US, and Indonesia are the top four of the most populous country and also 4 countries with most internet users.
Even the size of 10% of Indonesian internet users are almost the entire Taiwan population.
Re: Visualizing malicious IP addresses
#29> I was surpised to see that the distribution of attacks is extremely uneven with most of it concentrated in parts of Asia, Europe, and the US, and (almost) none from South America, Middle East, and Russia.
Aside from the casual stereotyping of bad actors here, the article completely neglects the fact that just because the attack is sourced from a certain IP/geolocation doesn't mean that the attacker resides in that location.
What you most likely have is a listed of pwned PCs with fast internet connections being used in botnets.