21–30 of 69 posts
You could even guarantee privacy. That would be some really useful data.
[flagged]
Imagine an AI learning from photos/videos of a person and their DNA sequence? And also a list of diseases, health records, etc. Then asking it for predictions while giving it feedback afterwards so it can tune itself. You could even guarantee privacy. That would be some really useful data.
I still consider biological life as the best ‘robot’ because it can create more of itself. As long as robots are incapable of recreation I don’t see the threat. One could say all maschines today are infertile.
What about computer viruses?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What about computer viruses?
Computer viruses run on hardware they do not create but merely hijack. Unless a virus took control of a semiconductor fab, it's hard to argue that they are alive/reproducing in the context of this discussion.
In a way, all life hijacks hardware (the material world) that it doesn't create to reproduce itself.
[flagged]
What can possibly go wrong if we let ChatGPT edit our DNA?
Reading their blog post I wonder if an LLMs is really the best way to do this. If I got it right, they used the LLM to enumerate potential protein DNA sequences. Does that really need an LLM? Enumeration is not novel, nor are LLMs particularily good at it. If you want to computationally parallelize the search in a large enumeration space it would be much easier to simply, well, do that instead of taking a detour via…
What can possibly go wrong if we let ChatGPT edit our DNA?