Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it would do us some good to worry as much about the workforce implications of these tools at least as much as we worry about things like AGI/Skynet. Four years ago UBI was being widely discussed. Now as we get closer to needing it, discussion has all but disappeared. IMO, the biggest challenge going forward is not technological, but instead it's convincing powerful, very dogmatic individuals, that what is ess…
I wonder if, instead of UBI, it would make more sense to give everyone a small set of robot servants. Say, 6 per person.
Along similar lines, I wondered about generative AI and how legally, it's not able to create copyrightable work. I really like that, it makes humans necessary for the creation intellectual property. Maybe in the future, each child born gets some allocation of AI agents when they turn 18, and the fruits of the labor of those agents would be assigned to that adult?