Live data from Hacker News

Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident

rnz.co.nz

21–30 of 158 posts

Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident

#21

Not turbulence related. Plane (Boeing 787-9) lost instrumentation according to the captain, followed by rapid loss of altitude. When instrumentation came back, flight continued to a safe landing. 12 people were sent to hospital. S always, see avherald.com for the most reliable, non-speculative info.

Let's rephrase that as, this is the story as relayed by one of the passengers to RNZ. If non-speculative info is what you're after, perhaps it's better to wait for the official report.

Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident

#22
post #16
post #5

What I don't get is why people are not using seatbelts. The only time I'm not using it is when I'm on the way to and from the bathroom. If I'm seated I'm using the seatbelt.

Latam is Chilean. I am not as well traveled in all SA countries but the exposure I have had suggested that seatbelts in cars are fairly optional still, I suspect on a plane you have less incentive.

They're optional for adults in cars here in New Hampshire where the official state motto is "Live free or die".

Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident

#23
Interestingly, this flight (Sydney-Santiago, via Auckland) is one of a few that many flat-earthers insist does not exist, since it contradicts a theory they have. They'd plot the paths of long-distance flights on a polar azimuthal equidistant projection of earth[0], and note that some one-stop flights look like a straight line on this projection. But those which don't look like a straight line (i.e. that suggest they're wrong) are dismissed as nonexistant, and part of the greater globe earth conspiracy.

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azimuthal_equidistant_projecti...

Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident

#24
post #16
post #5

What I don't get is why people are not using seatbelts. The only time I'm not using it is when I'm on the way to and from the bathroom. If I'm seated I'm using the seatbelt.

Latam is Chilean. I am not as well traveled in all SA countries but the exposure I have had suggested that seatbelts in cars are fairly optional still, I suspect on a plane you have less incentive.

In BsAs it's common to hop in a cab and find, as a courtesy, that they've tucked the safety belts in-between the seat cushions so you have a comfortable ride.

Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident

#25
post #5

What I don't get is why people are not using seatbelts. The only time I'm not using it is when I'm on the way to and from the bathroom. If I'm seated I'm using the seatbelt.

I was under the impression that seatbelts are basically mandatory at all times. On my recent turkish airlines flight the safety video requested you put it on and leave it on, ans the staff would come by and ask you to put your seatbelt on, even when theres no turbulence.

The "seat belt" indicator light should actually be changed to "dont get up and walk around"

Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident

#26
post #14

For anyone else wondering, the plane was a > Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner (Boeing, but not the 737 Max that has been in the headlines the past few years) Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/3/11/50-people-injur...

As if the 787 was any better. Just see the history of issues and reports about manufacturing.

Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident

#27
post #23

Interestingly, this flight (Sydney-Santiago, via Auckland) is one of a few that many flat-earthers insist does not exist, since it contradicts a theory they have. They'd plot the paths of long-distance flights on a polar azimuthal equidistant projection of earth[0], and note that some one-stop flights look like a straight line on this projection. But those which don't look like a straight line (i.e. that suggest they…

Maybe this was the flight passing through the necessary (government funded) wormhole

Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident

#28
post #5

What I don't get is why people are not using seatbelts. The only time I'm not using it is when I'm on the way to and from the bathroom. If I'm seated I'm using the seatbelt.

It definitely seems like the wise thing to do. There are enough reports of these events even if your risk of being caught up in one is low.

Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident

#29
post #23

Interestingly, this flight (Sydney-Santiago, via Auckland) is one of a few that many flat-earthers insist does not exist, since it contradicts a theory they have. They'd plot the paths of long-distance flights on a polar azimuthal equidistant projection of earth[0], and note that some one-stop flights look like a straight line on this projection. But those which don't look like a straight line (i.e. that suggest they…

[deleted]

Re: Latam Airlines SYD to AKL flight: 50 people treated after mid-air incident

#30
post #10
post #5

What I don't get is why people are not using seatbelts. The only time I'm not using it is when I'm on the way to and from the bathroom. If I'm seated I'm using the seatbelt.

After the recent incidents, I’d love to see zip line style safety lines in planes. When you get up to use the lavatory, you’d connect your carabiner to the aisle ceiling and floor lines to keep you level in case of a sudden movement.

I think you can forget about using the loo succesfully if you can't even walk down the aisle without incident...
Post reply on HN