Am I the only one to think of the text editor when I see Kate without much context in a title ?
no you're not ;-)
Kate image withdrawn by three news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns
21–30 of 38 posts
Re: Kate image withdrawn by three news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns
#22It is very normal for professional photographers to pose subjects separately or use head shots on the body of a different photo. In this case, the lighting on all of their faces is too consistent and similar, and indicates their faces were photographed separately and then composited. You would be surprised by the number of movie star promo photos you see where they have put the actor’s head on a different subjects bo…
But that's not normal for journalistic photos, which are assumed to be a record of an event that actually occurred.
Re: Kate image withdrawn by three news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns
#23It is very normal for professional photographers to pose subjects separately or use head shots on the body of a different photo. In this case, the lighting on all of their faces is too consistent and similar, and indicates their faces were photographed separately and then composited. You would be surprised by the number of movie star promo photos you see where they have put the actor’s head on a different subjects bo…
But that's not normal for journalistic photos, which are assumed to be a record of an event that actually occurred.
Re: Kate image withdrawn by three news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns
#24This seems to a bit more informative as to the issues: https://twitter.com/chrisshipitv/status/1766947758529822803/...
https://www.niemanlab.org/2024/03/this-is-just-weird-buzzfee...
Re: Kate image withdrawn by three news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns
#25Re: Kate image withdrawn by three news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns
#26Re: Kate image withdrawn by three news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
But that's not normal for journalistic photos, which are assumed to be a record of an event that actually occurred.
Is this a journalistic photo, though? It’s reportedly taken by William himself. It’s a PR photo, at best.
Re: Kate image withdrawn by three news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns
#28Re: Kate image withdrawn by three news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
But that's not normal for journalistic photos, which are assumed to be a record of an event that actually occurred.
For sure. I would imagine a portrait photographer may not understand the distinction though
Re: Kate image withdrawn by three news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns
#30Here's what Google has to say about the one in their pixel 8.
"If you’re trying to take a group photo, even if you take multiple shots, chances are someone is always looking away or blinking — we’ve all been there, especially if you’ve ever tried to take a photo with kids. To take the stress out of getting that perfect group shot, the new Best Take feature in Google Photos uses a series of similar photos taken close together to help you automatically create a blended image with everyone’s best expression."