I accidentally made my link shortener into a malware honeypot
21–30 of 118 posts
Re: I accidentally made my link shortener into a malware honeypot
#22As it turns out, my ISP was simply doing a rubbish job at blocking the site. After a few 10s of tries it eventually managed to redirect me to their warning page and prompted me to turn off settings in my account config. Thanks Virgin Media.
Re: I accidentally made my link shortener into a malware honeypot
#23 A big problem that came up at the domain level was what I'd call
a _trustworthy domain with untrustworthy subdomains_, specifically
where those subdomains represent user-generated content.
The Public Suffix List (PSL) [1] to the rescue! It can help with this kind of disambiguation.Paraphrasing, it's a list of domains where subdomains should be treated as separate sites (e.g. for cookie purposes). So `blogger.com` on the list means `*.blogger.com` are separate "sites".
Re: I accidentally made my link shortener into a malware honeypot
#24What's the benefit of a link shortener, these days? It made sense back before Twitter had one of their own. And I know that some people use it to get link analytics. I've also occasionally seen it used for printed materials, to get pretty URLs that are easy to hand-type. People also use it for malicious purposes, such as hiding malware, or disguising referral links, or otherwise trying to obfuscate where a link is go…
Re: I accidentally made my link shortener into a malware honeypot
#25The second most effective thing is making the malicious actor use some sort of resource. Such as a payment (the author uses), or a time commitment (eg new accounts can only create 1 link a day), or some other source of friction. The idea is that for legitimate users the friction is acceptably low, but for consistent spammers the cost becomes too high.
The 3rd thing I've found effective is that lots of spam comes from robots - or perhaps robots farming tasks to humans. If you can determine how the traffic is coming in and then filter that traffic effectively without indicating failure, robots can happily spam away and you can happily filter away.
Re: I accidentally made my link shortener into a malware honeypot
#26Re: I accidentally made my link shortener into a malware honeypot
#27I can really relate to this article! I created T.LY URL Shortener in 2018, and I've encountered all these issues and more! I found out the hard way when my hosting company shut down my servers for malicious content about a week into launching the site. Malicious actors will go to all sorts of lengths to achieve their goals. Be careful relying on Stripe to prevent these users. Next they will start using stolen credit…
Re: I accidentally made my link shortener into a malware honeypot
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was shocked that even with the free tier gone, there's still some level of abuse. Even the paywall doesn't totally cure the problem.
Passing malicious URL filters is crucial to operations like ransomware, phishing, etc - hiding a bad domain behind a good one is extremely valuable to hackers and relatively cheap. Though I am surprised they'd pay for it due to the payment -> identity link (maybe it's stolen CCs but Stripe is pretty good about blocking that).
Between gift cards, money mules, shell corporations, and "that country doesn't cooperate with investigations"...I'd guess that this is no more than a minor problem for serious criminals.
Re: I accidentally made my link shortener into a malware honeypot
#29What's the benefit of a link shortener, these days? It made sense back before Twitter had one of their own. And I know that some people use it to get link analytics. I've also occasionally seen it used for printed materials, to get pretty URLs that are easy to hand-type. People also use it for malicious purposes, such as hiding malware, or disguising referral links, or otherwise trying to obfuscate where a link is go…
My company has one they use to track who clicks on links in emails.
Re: I accidentally made my link shortener into a malware honeypot
#30What's the benefit of a link shortener, these days? It made sense back before Twitter had one of their own. And I know that some people use it to get link analytics. I've also occasionally seen it used for printed materials, to get pretty URLs that are easy to hand-type. People also use it for malicious purposes, such as hiding malware, or disguising referral links, or otherwise trying to obfuscate where a link is go…