What is stopping AMD from distributing a closed source binary blob along with selling the access to proprietary source code for $1?
HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec
21–30 of 170 posts
Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't miss it, DisplayPort is a really good replacement.
I think the connector good be better in terms of reversibility and none of that weird locking it has but it's an incredible technical achievement. And it seems perpetually ahead of HDMI in terms of features and Bandwidth.
Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec
#23I still miss DVI.
Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Someone without contracts with the HDMI Forum can probably release a working driver. However, AMD obviously needs to license the logo for their GPU boxes and their legal team have decided this prevents them releasing any source code based on the private specification regardless of what the code is called.
Also, that someone without contracts would probably need to call it different than "HDMI", because the term itself is trademarked and only licensed to Members (like "Wi-Fi" and "Bluetooth"). So a different term would be needed (like "WLAN" or "BT" is used by non-members)
Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec
#25Once you get a libre OS you can dump the content of the BUS or fake whatever HDMI hardware out there to get pristine audio and video frames. Also, the current Hollywood movies are very subpar compared to what we had in the 90's, so who cares.
My SO has an Amazon Prime account and yet they want to show adverts in middle of a media she already paid to be displayed without ads in theory. So, you are paying them twice. Thus, I don't consider Bittorrent piracy when you legally paid for a service but the streamers can break out the rules anytime.
Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec
#26Aren't we able to create and use open standards?
Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec
#27Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec
#28The question is why do we use proprietary formats and specifications such as HDMI, DisplayPort, Thunderbolt, Lightning. Aren't we able to create and use open standards?
Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec
#29The question is why do we use proprietary formats and specifications such as HDMI, DisplayPort, Thunderbolt, Lightning. Aren't we able to create and use open standards?
It sounds like you're not aware of the reason. I personally believe that the reson is that there are many entities pushing against open standards since they would make copying easier and DRM harder.
Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec
#30I still miss DVI.
The connector (resp Port) was too chunky for laptops and you didnt get sound over dvi, but other than that it worked just Fine each and every time. Never had issues upgrading stuff from VGA to DVI in an industrial Environment back then.