Live data from Hacker News

HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec

arstechnica.com

21–30 of 170 posts

Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec

#21
post #17

What is stopping AMD from distributing a closed source binary blob along with selling the access to proprietary source code for $1?

The source code is not a clean room re-implementation of the the HDMI 2.1 spec and as such contains IP owned in one way or another by the HDMI Forum. This would almost certainly preclude them from distributing source code to non HDMI Forum members under any license according to what I could glean from the article.

Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec

#22
post #12
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't miss it, DisplayPort is a really good replacement.

I think the connector good be better in terms of reversibility and none of that weird locking it has but it's an incredible technical achievement. And it seems perpetually ahead of HDMI in terms of features and Bandwidth.

And there is DP-Alt for USB Type-C, which makes it much nicer than a regular DP connector.

Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec

#24
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Someone without contracts with the HDMI Forum can probably release a working driver. However, AMD obviously needs to license the logo for their GPU boxes and their legal team have decided this prevents them releasing any source code based on the private specification regardless of what the code is called.

Also, that someone without contracts would probably need to call it different than "HDMI", because the term itself is trademarked and only licensed to Members (like "Wi-Fi" and "Bluetooth"). So a different term would be needed (like "WLAN" or "BT" is used by non-members)

Call it IDMH, I don't mind, honestly.

Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec

#25
The computer related companies should have given the middle finger to the media Mafiaa long ago and tell them to STFU if they ever wanted their content to be displayed in a computer with PC based standards and not MPEG.

Once you get a libre OS you can dump the content of the BUS or fake whatever HDMI hardware out there to get pristine audio and video frames. Also, the current Hollywood movies are very subpar compared to what we had in the 90's, so who cares.

My SO has an Amazon Prime account and yet they want to show adverts in middle of a media she already paid to be displayed without ads in theory. So, you are paying them twice. Thus, I don't consider Bittorrent piracy when you legally paid for a service but the streamers can break out the rules anytime.

Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec

#28

The question is why do we use proprietary formats and specifications such as HDMI, DisplayPort, Thunderbolt, Lightning. Aren't we able to create and use open standards?

It sounds like you're not aware of the reason. I personally believe that the reson is that there are many entities pushing against open standards since they would make copying easier and DRM harder.

Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec

#29

The question is why do we use proprietary formats and specifications such as HDMI, DisplayPort, Thunderbolt, Lightning. Aren't we able to create and use open standards?

It sounds like you're not aware of the reason. I personally believe that the reson is that there are many entities pushing against open standards since they would make copying easier and DRM harder.

This is correct. That's also why there is an ongoing trend to push users into walled gardens and onto hardware they do not control. Or as Cory Doctorow calls it the "war on general-purpose computing"

Re: HDMI Forum does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 spec

#30
post #6

I still miss DVI.

The connector (resp Port) was too chunky for laptops and you didnt get sound over dvi, but other than that it worked just Fine each and every time. Never had issues upgrading stuff from VGA to DVI in an industrial Environment back then.

Apple had a full-size DVI connector on their PowerBook G4 series of laptops.
Post reply on HN