21–23 of 23 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Moreover, how does one hold a chatbot responsible?
* Send it to a piece of RAM which then gets paged to disk * Make it give up 90% RAM privileges for 2 weeks * Threaten it with removal of last month's worth of training data
… But when Moffatt later attempted to receive the discount, he learned that the chatbot had been wrong. Air Canada only awarded bereavement fees if the request had been submitted before a flight. The airline later argued the chatbot was a separate legal entity “responsible for its own actions,”…. How exactly do you go about making a chatbot a legal entity?
Moreover, how does one hold a chatbot responsible?
Options could be always to have it include advertisement to competitors or for example porn or dating sites, in each discussion or with each message. Seems reasonable enough to implement and deliver.
Always deliver some message critical of Air Canada...
There is lot of creative ways it could communicate with other customers. Thus paying for the wrongs commited...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, but would it not be cool for this Ruling to have set a precedent for AI personhood? - thats something you would read in a humorously written scifi story
Oops. Accidental personhood. But only airplane chatbots.