Can't you just keep using the old version? It's pretty much feature complete after all Edit: yes the article mentions it so it's not nearly as bad as suggested IMO. If you're on an os from 2018 you're clearly not really dependent on the latest versions of everything. In the mean time you could start working on the OS upgrade. I don't really understand the wish for old versions in the Linux world. I use BSD myself whi…
> If you're on an os from 2018 you're clearly not really dependent on the latest versions of everything. I'm on Windows 10 which is from 2015. I want the latest software, but an older more stable OS (not Windows 11 yet). It's true that Windows 10 has had big updates (builds). But maybe that's the right approach?
Those “big updates” in Win 10 that you mention even use more or less the same versioning scheme as Ubuntu using the year and part of the year to identify the release. Windows 10 “22H2” is essentially the same name scheme as Ubuntu “22.10” don’t you think.
Ubuntu 18.04 is contemporary with Windows 10 version 1803. Hmm, I wonder if that came out in March 2018. Oh, it was April 2018 actually? Coincidence? If so, I guess it is also a coincidence that the next version came out in October 2018 ( version 1809 ). What was the next “Windows 10”? Oh look, it was 1903. It did not come out until May. I guess MS has a harder time keeping a schedule than Canonical does.
The real lesson here though is that you should not ship new software as native packages for older distros. If the distro is not updating it, you should not either.
If you want to ship VS Code for older distributions, do it as a Flatpak. If you do not think that is fair, I am sure you must be enjoying the version of VS Code that ships specifically for Windows 10 1803. Or are you using a VS Code installer that ships independently of the OS which targets multiple releases of the OS?