Live data from Hacker News

Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

nateliason.com

21–30 of 106 posts

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#21

I've been struggling to read nonfiction lately because so much of the content seems to be rehashed from other sources and leans heavily into persuasion of some greater point that gets bashed into your brain for 400 pages. It's like every book copied Malcolm Gladwell's style and it's too much for me. Am I just reading the wrong books?

If every book reads like Malcolm Gladwell (or Harari, et al), you probably are reading the wrong nonfiction books.

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#22
post #9

Read “infomania” as insomnia and skimmed the whole damn thing (or 80% if it) before figuring out this didn’t have the cure for insomnia (unless it’s caused by infomania, which is plausible).

Infomania does cause insomnia for me in that I often stay up later than I meant to because of the volume of things I’m trying to read or watch.

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#23
post #9

Read “infomania” as insomnia and skimmed the whole damn thing (or 80% if it) before figuring out this didn’t have the cure for insomnia (unless it’s caused by infomania, which is plausible).

What helped me: Glycine + Tryptophane + no coffee after noon + absolutely no devices after 10pm.

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#25

I was nodding along right until the rule… it allows for “entertainment” as part of your informational consumption. That’s a bit strange to me as I’d classify all of my “just in case” reading as entertainment.

I guess that's why they say "Fauxductivity" and not "Procrastination" ? But yeah, a lot of overlap there...

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#26
post #12

Reminds me of my own approach of RINORIN (read it now or read it never) which I've written about on HN before and led me to cancel all my RIL app subscriptions and create https://notado.app for my own personal needs instead.

I leave up articles for days hoping I'll read them, they pile up in my tabs— wasting so much memory. A lot of pc memory is wasted from just this on my end and I know I'm not the only one. It's interesting to think about how much wasted energy comes from tabs you're leaving open, hoping you'll get back to them one day.

Not much, at least on firefox. They exist as a couple of bytes on the hard drive until actually loaded.

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#27

I completely disagree with the article’s core premise. I have read voraciously for my entire life since I was a little kid. Maybe much of it wasted, yet tidbits of knowledge I have gained over the years of reading come up constantly, and give me a bit of a leg up in conversations. HN is a big part of that, I can read about a wide array of technologies and processes and science that I normally would never encounter. A…

If you like reading and aquiring knowledge, then by definition you can't waste your time reading or aquiring useless knowledge.

I do however, agree with the article in that you should actively choose what you read, instead of having content pushed towards you.

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#29
post #21

I've been struggling to read nonfiction lately because so much of the content seems to be rehashed from other sources and leans heavily into persuasion of some greater point that gets bashed into your brain for 400 pages. It's like every book copied Malcolm Gladwell's style and it's too much for me. Am I just reading the wrong books?

If every book reads like Malcolm Gladwell (or Harari, et al), you probably are reading the wrong nonfiction books.

Could you give me an example of one that for you is the "right kind" and I'll see if I feel the same way about it? Just as a check for myself.

Re: Fighting Infomania: Why 80% of Your Reading Is a Waste of Time (2016)

#30
Does reading have to be "productive" in order to be worthwhile? I would argue that reading is an enjoyable activity regardless of whether there are any tangible benefits. Similar to how it's enjoyable to go on a meandering walk. Even though there are more efficient forms of cardio and you could get to where your going faster by driving, that doesn't keep the activity from being enjoyable in and of itself.

I've probably forgotten 95% of everything I've ever read. But I certainly don't feel like all that time was wasted.

Post reply on HN