Live data from Hacker News

Riot Games laying off 11%

riotgames.com

21–30 of 158 posts

Re: Riot Games laying off 11%

#21
From the public info at least, this is one of the better examples of how to handle layoffs: generous severance, an apology that sounds sincere, a reasonable amount of info, etc.

To the commenters saying this is just about juicing profits: ok, maybe so, but it seems at least equally plausible that it is what he says it is. Once you've reached the point that you've realized you've made a mistake, it makes sense to act.

Re: Riot Games laying off 11%

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Accountable... to the board, who are loving the efficiencies. Who's upset with this CEO's actions besides the families affected by it, who have no power individually over anything to hold him accountable? They're his capital resources. Executives aren't accountable to that.

But what about being held accountable for all the “significant investments” that didn’t pan out into the expected revenue? The board may be happy that the layoff cuts cost, but is the board happy with a CEO that has made multiple bad bets?

> is the board happy with a CEO that has made multiple bad bets?

Which bad bets?

Re: Riot Games laying off 11%

#23

Their severance looks good, (6mo minimum, cash bonus, health insurance, computer, etc). Also, kinda weird to being referred as a bet.

Every forward looking business strategy decision is a bet.

Everything in life in a way could be thought of as a bet. It's all a probabilities game. When you travel, you are betting your airplane doesn't crash, you don't get robbed, kidnapped etc.

Re: Riot Games laying off 11%

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Accountable... to the board, who are loving the efficiencies. Who's upset with this CEO's actions besides the families affected by it, who have no power individually over anything to hold him accountable? They're his capital resources. Executives aren't accountable to that.

But what about being held accountable for all the “significant investments” that didn’t pan out into the expected revenue? The board may be happy that the layoff cuts cost, but is the board happy with a CEO that has made multiple bad bets?

Riot Games actually changed CEOs in 2023.

https://www.riotgames.com/en/news/announcing-dylan-jadeja-ri...

Re: Riot Games laying off 11%

#26
post #12

It's a decent severance package, honestly. But, as usual, > As CEO, I’m accountable for the changes we’re making and where we’re headed in the future. So, I think it’s important for me to share how we got here and how the next few days will work. I see no indication as to how Dylan will actually be held accountable for the decisions that ultimately led to this.

See this comment in every layoff thread. There is actually no reason why being accountable for something means you necessarily face imposed consequences for something. That does not follow. They are not synonyms.

Re: Riot Games laying off 11%

#27
post #12

It's a decent severance package, honestly. But, as usual, > As CEO, I’m accountable for the changes we’re making and where we’re headed in the future. So, I think it’s important for me to share how we got here and how the next few days will work. I see no indication as to how Dylan will actually be held accountable for the decisions that ultimately led to this.

"Accountable" doesn't mean you have to be punished.

Re: Riot Games laying off 11%

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every forward looking business strategy decision is a bet.

Everything in life in a way could be thought of as a bet. It's all a probabilities game. When you travel, you are betting your airplane doesn't crash, you don't get robbed, kidnapped etc.

People that think that way often don't worry as much about hurting other people.

Re: Riot Games laying off 11%

#29

Riot Games is profitable, so this is about increasing profits. EDIT: As several people have noted, while Riot Games is private, their majority owne (Tencent) is not. According to Tencent's most recent filings, video game revenue is up by double-digits and they reported profits in the past. Unless Riot is claiming that they increased expenses by double-digit % in Q4, they are profitable.

Why wouldn’t they want to be as profitable as possible? They aren’t a charity.

That’s true. Riot games isn’t a charity, but workers and their families certainly are. Clearly we must sacrifice grandma in a glorious email layoff ritual for both the economy and a sweet C-suite end year bonus
Post reply on HN