21–27 of 27 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Intuitive's Da Vinci has been doing it commercially for 20 years....in surgury
Please don't mistake progression for completion. And, I don't think comparing the two is logical, for price (Da Vinci is $2,000,000), end goal (the 500kg Da Vinci will never walk across the room and pick up a box), or even degrees of freedom.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm sorry, what does the CyberTruck have to do with the conversation, or their fairly obvious progression in actuation, or progression in making a nice humanoid platform for machine learning use, or Da Vinci?
It means the gap between what Musk promises will be available, and the cost thereof, versus the reality of what is available, when, and for how much, is "rather sizable" at times.
But, sure, I don't really pay attention to timelines, since I don't have it on pre-order. They're making great progress. They will throw ML/AI at it, and it will be interesting to see what comes out. For people that enjoy tech, this is neat.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please don't mistake progression for completion. And, I don't think comparing the two is logical, for price (Da Vinci is $2,000,000), end goal (the 500kg Da Vinci will never walk across the room and pick up a box), or even degrees of freedom.
You don't know what they're working on. If anyone can design a robot that does that, it's them, or Boston dynamics
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Intuitive's Da Vinci has been doing it commercially for 20 years....in surgury
Please don't mistake progression for completion. And, I don't think comparing the two is logical, for price (Da Vinci is $2,000,000), end goal (the 500kg Da Vinci will never walk across the room and pick up a box), or even degrees of freedom.
How much does a Tesla robot cost and where can I buy one?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please don't mistake progression for completion. And, I don't think comparing the two is logical, for price (Da Vinci is $2,000,000), end goal (the 500kg Da Vinci will never walk across the room and pick up a box), or even degrees of freedom.
> And, I don't think comparing the two is logical, for price (Da Vinci is $2,000,000) What's the over-under on the $35K CyberTruck ever making it to market, instead of vague handwaving "sometime towards the end of 2025, maybe"?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It means the gap between what Musk promises will be available, and the cost thereof, versus the reality of what is available, when, and for how much, is "rather sizable" at times.
I'm still not sure how Da Vinci relates, or the CyberTruck. But, sure, I don't really pay attention to timelines, since I don't have it on pre-order. They're making great progress . They will throw ML/AI at it, and it will be interesting to see what comes out. For people that enjoy tech, this is neat.
-Me, hearing Elon in 2015 describing fully autonomous self-driving as a "solved problem" and stating that "we will have complete autonomy in approximately two years."
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Baseline is able bodied human which Optimus is supposed to replace on manufacturing line.
Engineering doesn't ever involve starting with a final product. We're witnessing progression, nothing more nothing less. Progression can be observed and "appreciated", on its own. Working towards something "neat" is the modus operandi of most users here, and for some of us, seeing others working towards something "neat" is fun to watch.