This is a great response — accepting that it was handled poorly, reinforcing that this was purely about the person/role fit rather than the person, noting that layoffs in general are business as usual, and committing to do better. Nicely done, @eastdakota .
> This is a great response Hard disagree. > accepting that it was handled poorly Technically he accepted it 'wasn't perfect'. Which is different to 'poorly' (other side of average). > reinforcing that this was purely about the person/role fit rather than the person He hinted at three reasons (without actually stating which one applies in the individual case): poor performance, lack of improvement after communicating…
> did some quick stats and didn't set limits on when people were hired when doing the stats
> manager fckd up and didn't tell the individual they were performing badly
This is even more likely when you account for Nov 20 - Jan 2 being the most likely time of the year for extended vacations (for manager, analytics, and buyers), corporate distractions (holiday parties and team building, next year planning), and a slowdown in all sales cycles.