I have the feeling they're currently in the final stages of development for an alternative and want to remove RSS from all their stuff right now to preemptively avoid people lamenting its sudden removal then.
Maybe I'm to wishful, but if that's the case, then it's probably related to the Fediverse.
People don't understand how much RSS is useful... I'm still angry at Google for killing Reader. It was the best way to consume content on the web.
> I'm still angry at Google for killing Reader. It was the best way to consume content on the web. I never used Reader so I'm not genuinely curious, what about it makes it difficult for someone to just create a copy of the service?
It's not about features. It's about defaults. Google Reader was linked right there on the top bar of the world's largest search engine. No one could credibly claim RSS was dead or neglect/remove support for it in the next revision.
> If you've ended up here, chances are you're looking to subscribe to our blog in your RSS feed. > Unfortunately, we don't have official RSS feed support for now, but we're actively working on a solution. Well, that certainly means they are going to have RSS feeds in the future. Right?
No no no, they're working on "a solution". That means they will built Google Updates™, a locked-down walled-garden push system with premium tiers.