Q-Transformer

Post by jansan » Thu, Nov 30, 2023, 2:48 PM UTC

Philpax wrote: post #5

Worth noting that this came from DeepMind in Sep-Oct of this year, so it's not related to OpenAI's "unfortunate" leak [0] of Q*. [0] https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/29/23982046/sam-altman-inte...

Post by wiz21c » Thu, Nov 30, 2023, 2:50 PM UTC

amelius wrote: post #16

varjag wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indeed: we have machines doing novel work in organic synthesis but none yet to empty a dishwasher.

This already exists: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAG_FBZJVJ8

Post by GTP » Thu, Nov 30, 2023, 3:04 PM UTC

3cats-in-a-coat wrote: post #25

jansan wrote: post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, it is not Amazon Q, which was presented yesterday: https://aws.amazon.com/de/q/

Also it's not Q from Star Trek, or Q stars which are an exotic form of matter immediately preceding the singularity of a black hole.

Post by [deleted] » Thu, Nov 30, 2023, 3:08 PM UTC

spacebacon wrote: post #7

Operation reclaim the letter Q within a reasonable objective reality.

Post by kristjansson » Thu, Nov 30, 2023, 3:24 PM UTC

GTP wrote: post #26

3cats-in-a-coat wrote: post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also it's not Q from Star Trek, or Q stars which are an exotic form of matter immediately preceding the singularity of a black hole.

Also, it's not Android Q.