Live data from Hacker News

F*** Paywalls

1ft.io

21–30 of 92 posts

Re: F*** Paywalls

#21

20 years of World Wide Web and we still don't have micropayments so we can just pay a penny to read an article. Why does it take us so long?

News vendors don't want you to pay for individual articles you're interested in.

They want you to pay for all the articles, including the shitty ones, every month.

Re: F*** Paywalls

#22

Doesn't work for most stuff anymore either. I've been using this after archive.ph became captcha hell and 12ft.io got blocked

For all of 12ft.io’s bluster it seems that they turn it off politely if the target site asks which means it doesn’t accomplish anything at all. Archive.ph needs to do something about the CAPTCHAs but maybe that is what they have to to shed load so they can afford to run it.

Re: F*** Paywalls

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly, just like I expect to get paid for my work. I want a simple way to pay for all the pay walls in aggregate so I'm not signing up for 27 different subscriptions and I read one article from each source. I'm not against paying, I'm against a huge pile of bullshit management.

How do you feel about Apple news, or similar aggregators?

[deleted]

Re: F*** Paywalls

#25

lol what do people expect? You say you want a web without ads, now you want a web without paywalls. Sorry, but... pick one. Or watch as the internet collapses.

The fundamental problem is that you can't unread an article if you don't like it, and get your money back.

Re: F*** Paywalls

#26

lol what do people expect? You say you want a web without ads, now you want a web without paywalls. Sorry, but... pick one. Or watch as the internet collapses.

The issue is the paywalls preventing access to information. Information should be available to everybody, regardless of whether or not they have the means to pay for it. Imo, it's best to have paid features that are not expected to be provided for free that helps pay for the free features or if going the advertisement route, make advertisements that are non-obtrusive and don't make the user's experience worse.

Re: F*** Paywalls

#27

20 years of World Wide Web and we still don't have micropayments so we can just pay a penny to read an article. Why does it take us so long?

One reason: it wouldn't be a penny. You're off by a factor of probably 100.

Re: F*** Paywalls

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly, just like I expect to get paid for my work. I want a simple way to pay for all the pay walls in aggregate so I'm not signing up for 27 different subscriptions and I read one article from each source. I'm not against paying, I'm against a huge pile of bullshit management.

How do you feel about Apple news, or similar aggregators?

Those hit the same issue, given they are just linking to various sources, each with a paywall.

At least Google News and Artifact lets you block sources and with Artifact it understands paywalls, so stops recommending you posts after a while.

The one thing both of them are missing is the ability add a new source. E.g. if I stumble upon an interesting blog post or newsletter, let me add that blog to the mix, but use the same algorithm to incorporate the post intelligently into the algo feed.

Re: F*** Paywalls

#30

20 years of World Wide Web and we still don't have micropayments so we can just pay a penny to read an article. Why does it take us so long?

control of money. It's not a lack of solutions but the people who control money make the solutions illegal , because taxation / terrorism / child porn / the usual
Post reply on HN