> but the device failed to win us over in terms of multi-core performance If a dev machine I'd get it, but biz users are email and a few small spreadsheets. I don't get why biz users need multicore anything.
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4
21–30 of 98 posts
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4
#22Happy to see the refresh. These APU systems are great. The alarmingly priced usb-c dock works. Three monitors around laptop, no problem. The LTE modem works out of the box on windows and works with some arguing on Linux (I built a driver from GitHub, but that's probably improved since). An not-obvious benefit of the Lenovo ones is they're on the approved list for AMD's employees, so broken stuff is pretty immediately…
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4
#23The i7-1355U version takes pretty big hit, starting from 1500 units going quickly down to 1000. Probably due to thermal throttling.
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4
#24Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4
#25Glad to see it has a 16:10 screen. 16:9 is a curse.
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4
#26Happy to see the refresh. These APU systems are great. The alarmingly priced usb-c dock works. Three monitors around laptop, no problem. The LTE modem works out of the box on windows and works with some arguing on Linux (I built a driver from GitHub, but that's probably improved since). An not-obvious benefit of the Lenovo ones is they're on the approved list for AMD's employees, so broken stuff is pretty immediately…
What's the battery life like on linux?
That said, the spec sheet MobileMark benchmark says battery life is as good as 14.3 hrs in max battery setting on WUXGA Low Power (non-touch), Win 11, 52.5Wh battery, versus a performance mode getting 5.0 hrs on 2.8K OLED (non-touch), Win 11, 39.3 Wh battery. With 'local video playback' lasting longer. So I guess it's very hardware and use-case specific. (https://psref.lenovo.com/syspool/Sys/PDF/ThinkPad/ThinkPad_T...)
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4
#27Does anyone know if it's possible to buy thinkpads with a US keyboard layout in Europe? Any thinkpad with a layout that's not the non-qwerty local variant of my country takes more than 6 weeks to deliver, and that is to get UK layout, not the US layout with different enter key, which I can't even find available at all
Isn't the English (EU) layout close enough? I think it's basically the US layout with a Euro sign somewhere, but the physical key layout should be the same as a regular US keyboard.
For starters the return key are different widths, which is a deal breaker if you’re a touchtyper used to wider return keys.
Programming also uses tilde and other symbols that are different between the two.
Overall they’re similar for typing alphabets, but symbols and enter key are different.
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4
#28Glad to see it has a 16:10 screen. 16:9 is a curse.
How come? Most video being 16:9 means you useball of the screen you have, 16:10 adds bars on one side doesn't it?
Do you use your laptop to work, or just watch video all the time?
Because if you actually do work, 16:10 or 3:2 is much better.
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4
#29> but the device failed to win us over in terms of multi-core performance If a dev machine I'd get it, but biz users are email and a few small spreadsheets. I don't get why biz users need multicore anything.
Honestly the 8core ~15W things are alright for dev work. It seems to be game for giving all the power budget to one core. Runs a badly configured Emacs with misc c++ parsing nonsense without trouble, and I build llvm on one every few months without too much irritation.
Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
How come? Most video being 16:9 means you useball of the screen you have, 16:10 adds bars on one side doesn't it?
> How come? Most video being 16:9 means you useball of the screen you have, 16:10 adds bars on one side doesn't it? Do you use your laptop to work, or just watch video all the time? Because if you actually do work, 16:10 or 3:2 is much better.