As a rule, when trying to convey information, I try to write and speak plainly. I try to avoid jargon. I have found many academic papers in the faux sciences to be extremely dense and full of terms that are only known to the priests of that arcane subject (still subsidized by taxes as if the result is a common good). If you have a point, say it. There is no need to write in legalese. When I see supposed research writ…
The shortest papers ever published (2016)
21–30 of 84 posts
Re: The shortest papers ever published (2016)
#22Re: The shortest papers ever published (2016)
#23Re: The shortest papers ever published (2016)
#24Re: The shortest papers ever published (2016)
#25The guy who published it seems kooky as well. Would love to interview him some day!
Re: The shortest papers ever published (2016)
#26I was hoping that LLMs would help with "writer's block", but their limited context window has been a PITA. Has anyone have had any success with ROPE scaled models or claude 100k?
Re: The shortest papers ever published (2016)
#27“?”
Publisher replied:
“!”
Re: The shortest papers ever published (2016)
#28Vaguely related but I remember the tale of an author on vacation after publication of his latest novel. He telegramed his publisher to enquire about reception: “?” Publisher replied: “!”
Re: The shortest papers ever published (2016)
#29"Molekularstrahlenablenkungsmethode"
The journal turned it down.
https://www.aip.org/history-programs/niels-bohr-library/oral...
Re: The shortest papers ever published (2016)
#30I was hoping that LLMs would help with "writer's block", but their limited context window has been a PITA. Has anyone have had any success with ROPE scaled models or claude 100k?